Take the 2-minute tour ×
The Workplace Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for members of the workforce navigating the professional setting. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Can I attend 3 years experience Java interview with 2.7 years experience? Will the companies strictly follow experience criteria?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by CMW, enderland, mhoran_psprep, ReallyTiredOfThisGame, jcmeloni Mar 10 at 18:49

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

10  
Of course. Requirements in job posts are usually wishlists, not hard limits. –  Juha Untinen Mar 10 at 12:52
1  
Of couse not. Requirements in job posts are usually hard limits, not wishlists. –  CMW Mar 10 at 12:59
1  
Hi user, welcome to The Workplace. Unfortunately we can't tell you whether you can attend said interview as it depends solely on what that company's policies are regarding these requirements. Answers to this question will thus be mainly opinion based and may well contradict each other. Compare my comment to Juha's for example. As it stands this question is a rather bad fit for this site. Maybe taking a look at help center will help you improve it. –  CMW Mar 10 at 13:04
3  
This is the same question. –  enderland Mar 10 at 13:31

4 Answers 4

of course. First of all, 0.3 years is not much difference. If it would be 2 years, I'd still recommend. Here's why:

Often, it's not an exact match they're looking for-it's the right skill set

more on this: http://lifehacker.com/5908557/why-you-should-still-apply-to-a-job-even-if-you-dont-meet-the-exact-job-requirements

share|improve this answer
    
This is the best answer so far because it is more than just voicing an opinion. –  CMW Mar 10 at 13:11
1  
+1 to this. I got a job that was looking for 3-5 years experience when I only had 2.5 at the time. If you can prove that you are sufficiently proficient with the skills the company wants for the job they are often willing to over look things like years of experience. –  Lee Abraham Mar 10 at 13:34

Well you can clearly still apply for interview. Whether or not the company considers 3 years to be a strict limit or not depends on the company. I'd be very surprised if it was that strict. HR departments quickly learn that if they have hard and fast rules in place for this, they end up tossing potentially excellent candidates.

share|improve this answer

When applying for jobs, I tend to follow the "80% match" rule. As in, I only apply if I meet at least 80% of the criteria listed in the job posting. It can be hard to tell which of the long list of requirements (especially in tech) are "must-haves" vs. "nice-to-haves", and I almost never see a job listing for which I'm a 100% perfect match (unless it's one of those overly generic "developer, software (10 ea.)" job listings, which I wouldn't apply for anyway because they provide absolutely no information about the job itself).

Anyway, my point is, if being slightly under the experience requirement is the only requirement you don't exactly meet, I would definitely apply.

share|improve this answer

When a company offers to take the time to interview you, you can figure that they've already taken the time to compare your resume or job application to the requirements for the job. That typically included required education and years of experience. If they haven't, that's not your problem.

So if they don't have any concerns about your years of experience - why should you?

In all honesty, for this specific question 2.7 vs. 3 years just isn't that big a difference. Mileage will always vary, but there really is no magical number that creates a level between "acceptable" and "unacceptable" - the difference is learning from experience and depth of understanding.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.