Take the 2-minute tour ×
The Workplace Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for members of the workforce navigating the professional setting. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question already has an answer here:

I applied for a job. I was called for an interview. My interview went really well. I was asked questions which I answered pretty nicely and people there interviewing me seemed really happy with my answers.

But I got a rejection. Upon exploring further, I discovered that someone who had personal links got the job, someone who was less qualified than me.

Being polite, I wrote an email to the interviewer asking if there was anything that I lacked and I could improve to get jobs in future. I did not get a reply. Is there anything I can do regarding what went wrong during the selection process?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by DJClayworth, gnat, Michael Grubey, ReallyTiredOfThisGame, jcmeloni Apr 17 at 13:58

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

8  
It's like being rejected after the first date. You are looking for an objective reason why you got rejected when you yourself disclosed a subjective reason: someone with personal links. As far as that other person being less qualified than you, who cares? You talk as if you are entitled to the job merely because you think that your qualifications are better. That's not how it works in the real world. Look for another opportunity elsewhere. You are just wasting your time barking up that tree. –  Vietnhi Phuvanmail Apr 17 at 11:59
1  
The person with personal links may be less qualified than you are... but perhaps he or she was also willing to accept a smaller compensation package. –  Stephan Kolassa Apr 17 at 13:39
    
@user18845 - How exactly do you know they are less qualified for the job? –  Ramhound Apr 17 at 13:48
    
The game is rigged. Welcome to the world. –  Wesley Long Apr 17 at 16:34

2 Answers 2

up vote 22 down vote accepted

Is there anything I can do regarding what went with selection process?

No.

The selection is done. If this is a normal company employment (and not some sort of government agency with publicly-available selection rules that must be followed), and assuming no discrimination laws have been violated, then there is no recourse.

It happens. There is no strict scoring algorithm for selecting candidates. An employer is free to select using any basis they choose. Qualifications are part of coming up with the "best" candidate, but "gut feel" is another, as are personal links.

Often there are a group of candidates with roughly similar qualifications and a hiring manager must choose one. Often, attributes other than qualifications come into play.

You probably don't know all the factors that went into this particular selection, and won't have any way to know. We've all been rejected from jobs for which we were qualified. It happens. Time to move on.

share|improve this answer
2  
"Often, attributes other than qualifications come into play." My own experience is that always attributes other than qualifications come into play. Given a choice between two people the one that fits the company culture most will usually win, just because they're going to fit in a lot better. –  Ben Apr 17 at 13:27

You are using some false assumptions here.

The first one is that just because you thought the interview went well does not mean that they thought it did. I've interviewed people in the past who thought they did a great job in the interview and couldn't believe they weren't selected. Often, they did not do nearly as well as they thought they did. We are not looking just for technical skill but for fit with the team. And some technical skills are more important to us than others. And sometimes what you think is the right answer to a question is not what we think it is.

Next you assume you should get the job because you are qualified for the job. Most hiring managers try never to even interview people who are not qualified at least on paper. So likely all your serious competitors for the job were qualified. Qualifications may get you the interview, they do not get you the job.

Next is the assumption that just because you did well, you are entitled to the job. But you forget that this is a competition. Other people may have done as well or better than you did in the interview. If I have one position and three people I would love to hire, I still can't hire all three, I don't have the budget for that.

Next you seem to feel you are entitled to some sort of explanation from the people who didn't hire you. Why on earth would they ever do that? Is there any benefit to the company in telling candidates why they were not hired? No. Is there any risk? Yes.

Another hard truth is that sometimes a job was created for a specific person, but company rules mean they have to interview several people. When this happens, no one except the person they created the job for is going to get the job. It doesn't matter how well you do on the interview. The best you can hope for in this case is that they will be impressed enough with you to want to consider you seriously the next time they have an opening. Making them mad by complaining about not getting the job and pestering them as to why, puts you out of the running for any future openings too. I'm not saying this is the case with this job, but it may be because they have personal ties to the person they hired.

Even if this isn't the case, it still may work out better for the guy with personal contacts. If the hiring manager is comparing Joe, a person he has worked with before and who he knows to be reliable, dependable and great problem solver, to Harry, who seems to be very qualifed but who he only knows from the interview, which one is going to interest him more? The sure bet of Joe who he knows can do the job even if he needs to get up to speed on one of the technologies (but he has seen him do that before) or Harry who he only knows from an hour interview? Add into that mix the fact that the last guy they hired who seemed really qualifed didn't work out. Most people would hire Joe under those same circumstances. That doesn't say anything bad about you, just that they view Joe as the less risky hire. If Joe had not applied, then they might have chosen you. There is a reason why many companies offer bonuses to employees who recommend someone. That is because people with a personal recommendation are a much smaller risk to hire. A bad hire is expensive for the company. Hiring known candidates takes much of the risk away.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for your comprehensive answer :) –  Vietnhi Phuvanmail Apr 17 at 13:49
    
Yep really excellent answer HLGEM, I think you covered all the bases! –  Carson63000 Apr 17 at 23:41

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.