Tell me more ×
The Workplace Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for members of the workforce navigating the professional setting. It's 100% free, no registration required.
up vote 16 down vote favorite
3

While looking for a new job, how can I use my time in the most efficient manner?

More specific, I am happily employed where I am right now, but I know I won't grow here. I am looking for something new with opportunities for growth. But I would like to avoid going for an interview (setting up, preparing, going there, talking to the interviewer, doing their tests, organising notes afterwards) which can easily take 4-5 hours... only to then be invited to a second interview, at the very end of which salary is discussed, to then find out they only offer 75% of what I make right now. A waste of time for both parties.

On the other hand, talking about salary before even meeting the company makes you seem very money-driven, and I doubt this will give you the best rates.

How do I weed out the bad offers, while still keeping the good ones? How do I avoid wasting their and my time?

share|improve this question
3  
Just a comment on your comment that "before even meeting the company makes you seem very money-driven, and I doubt this will give you the best rates." Not really -- it makes you specific in your needs and desirous of not wasting anyone's time. Just like you don't want to waste your time, I don't want my time wasted, which is precisely why I always advertise the pay range for open positions, and remind applicants in the initial contact email I send re: interviewing just what that range is, so they can self-select out if they've forgotten. It just makes sense, if the range is known. – jcmeloni Jul 4 '12 at 18:07
1  
jcmeloni: I wish everyone did that. But there are disadvantages too: people currently working at the company might feel wronged, applicants will try to aim for the upper amount and not accept anything lower... – Konerak Jul 4 '12 at 18:24
Sure. However, the first issue is something the individuals, their managers, and HR can deal with as needed -- the benefit for posting the range has, in my experience, far outweighed some feelings of insecurity on the inside. On the second issue, if an applicant says they need the high end of the range and won't budge, that's fine by me (given two equally qualified candidates, if one asks for the low end & one the high end, I don't use that as the deciding factor). However, if a company posts a range and never intends to pay the upper end of it, that's as problematic as not posting one at all. – jcmeloni Jul 4 '12 at 19:00

2 Answers

up vote 7 down vote accepted

I think the main items to consider are:

  1. How much you are paid now. If you do a salary survey and find that you are at the top of the rang for your area/experience it's more likely to be an issue. If you're at the bottom, then 75% of that would not be good too.

  2. Study the company. You can usually tell a great deal about salary from the company. Try to see how it is funded. Look at the location and building they are in. I've seen comfy+++ vs. rats in the back hall.

  3. Study the industry. Different industries have vastly different pay structures. A job in local government is more likely to have a lower salary then a widely successful internet startup that's lush in cash.. on a shoestring. Non-profits may have less money, but that varies by industry too, e.g. large hospitals can sometimes pay well vs. small charities that often can't.

  4. Look at existing personnel. See if you can research folks bio's and get a sense of their background and whether it's likely that a high salary would attract or be needed by them.

  5. Accept the process. It's painful but this is also one of those area where you just have to have a lot of patience.

share|improve this answer
Thanks, especially for #5. I guess this really is no matter to rush, and putting in those extra few hours can make a difference. It's just hard to not see that as wasted hours when a company reveals itself as a total mismatch after all those hours spent with/on them. – Konerak Jul 4 '12 at 16:01
up vote 7 down vote

Salary: Ask Early!

Personally, I've always at least evocated salary right from the first face-to-face interview, if not during the phone screening. And if going through an agency, I set a base salary and I explicitely say I won't look at the ones that are below this threshold.

It may sound harsh and cocky, but in the end you save everybody's time, and it's better to be told "I'm sorry, but I'm not the person you should talk to for salary negotiations, this is handled later on during the process", than to indeed show up in vain. I'm not saying that I downright demand to negociate it on the stop, but I request to know their ballpark (they may not have thought of one yet), and may give them my ballpark. You can bet they'll write that down and discuss it amongst themselves afterwards, which is what you want in the end.

Be upfront, be professional, and there's no harm done and no hard feelings.

The thing most people fail to understand when interviewing, is that the applicant is here to interview the company and its employees just as much as they are here to interview him/her. You're not hurting them, you are just openly discussing conditions. It's called communication, and it's healthy, as long as you keep it civil.

Salary Threshold Tips

Additionally, I'd recommend putting this salary threshold relatively higher than the actual salary I'd settle for, for multiple reasons:

  • It's a common marketing and psychological trick: the more expensive the better. It looks like you have more experience. Don't shoot too high, but be sure to not underestimate yourself. And even if you happen to shoot too high (be sure to correct that tough), it's better to look like a fool once than to get trampled.

  • Some agencies will still send you stuff through (because they are incompetent, or because their system doesn't handle limits, or because they do like you: they take chances).

  • It obviously gives room for bargain. For instance, to then give up some of that "soft" base against in favor of other benefits.

share|improve this answer
1  
I don't know about this advice, I've had better success at letting them set the salary first and then have a chance at scoffing it. :-) But it all depends on the situation. – Spoike Jul 12 '12 at 9:00
@Spoike: I never said in my answer that you should give your price first. I said you should discuss your salary, and when you do aim for larger bounds. It's always better if you get them to give a price first, of course. It's also why the agencies can be a double-edged sword, as it helps to filter out ads, but they might give that information to prospective companies, even if you ask them not to. Which is also why shooting rather high still gives you a negotiating margin. – haylem Jul 12 '12 at 10:14
Yeah, but keep in mind the caveats with your advice: most HR people I've been in contact with think discussing salary on your first face-to-face interview is a red flag of bad behavior. Especially if you're looking for a junior level job, coming from college, then you really are in no position about setting your salary level. I can imagine though seniors with more trust and authority have an easier time to talk shop about salary. – Spoike Jul 12 '12 at 12:07
@Spoike: It raises a ref-flag in that it's unusual and you may appear cocky. Or bold. Some might say confident. It's your duty to not come across as a douche during your interviews. Also in IT (though the question wasn't specific) it's not unusual to not let HR drive: the only thing they managed with regard to recruitment for companies I worked for was mostly just discussing contractual points after 1 or 2 real interviews, and to schedule them. They strangely don't have a say in the decision, and just verify that you fit. – haylem Jul 12 '12 at 18:53
@Spoike: I won't say there's no risk at all, of course, but it's a mangeable one and I find its benefits outweigh the caveats. YMMV, but it served me well so far. – haylem Jul 12 '12 at 18:54

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.