Timeline for How to explain a bad performance review
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2020 at 23:13 | comment | added | mathrick | FYI, that's not the correct use of "recurring". I think you might've meant to use "resorting to" or "recourse to" there. | |
| Aug 1, 2014 at 18:33 | comment | added | Raiyan | How did you manage to get the two good reviews after the bad one ? Did you switch jobs ? | |
| Aug 1, 2014 at 18:07 | answer | added | sevensevens | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 8, 2013 at 4:57 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackWorkplace/status/331996323253473280 | ||
| Apr 29, 2013 at 18:25 | answer | added | HLGEM | timeline score: 12 | |
| Apr 29, 2013 at 18:11 | comment | added | Blrfl | Consider asking the new manager if he'd go to bat for you. | |
| Apr 29, 2013 at 16:18 | comment | added | Denisse | Not really, what I have is the scores that followed, which come from doing the same job, but I don't think will help much. | |
| Apr 29, 2013 at 16:15 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 29, 2013 at 16:21 | |||||
| Apr 29, 2013 at 16:15 | comment | added | Onno | Is there anything that you can use to back your story? If you don't have the evidence, the grades will do a lot of the talking. (unfortunately) | |
| Apr 29, 2013 at 15:58 | history | asked | Denisse | CC BY-SA 3.0 |