Timeline for Potential employer flew me out for interview, cancels return flight
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2019 at 2:16 | comment | added | Marcin | @Joshua Fraud is not a statute, it's a concept. Also...what's the fraud here? | |
| Jan 23, 2019 at 0:09 | comment | added | Joshua | @Marcin: Fraud. | |
| Jan 22, 2019 at 23:59 | comment | added | Marcin | @Joshua Under what statute? You don't just get treble damages because someone has been very bad. | |
| Jan 22, 2019 at 18:34 | comment | added | Joshua | @Marcin: On the other hand the US treble damages may well be enough to afford the attorney. | |
| Jan 22, 2019 at 17:00 | comment | added | Marcin | @UKMonkey Vanishingly unlikely in the US. | |
| Jan 22, 2019 at 14:49 | comment | added | UKMonkey | "Do talk to them to see if they can make this right." OP already tried that and was told to stop harassing them. I would also highlight that in cases like this, OP MAY be awarded their legal fees also | |
| Jan 22, 2019 at 13:19 | comment | added | Marcin | Well, there's no meaningful compensation here, because it's going to be costly to pursue. The recourse is only revenge to expose this behaviour - but revenge has its own dangers. | |
| Jan 22, 2019 at 1:20 | comment | added | Fiksdal | This answer seems to be advocating going for "revenge", while also citing an old Chinese proverb that warns of the dangers and pitfalls of revenge? | |
| Jan 21, 2019 at 16:07 | history | answered | Marcin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |