Timeline for Recruiter fell through, can/should I approach the company directly?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 14, 2014 at 10:39 | answer | added | gnasher729 | timeline score: 3 | |
Sep 17, 2013 at 18:15 | vote | accept | bengoesboom | ||
Sep 17, 2013 at 14:49 | comment | added | bengoesboom | @JuliaHayward I had thought of that, but then wouldn't the company have contacted me directly afterwards? Or are they contractually prevented from doing so? | |
Sep 17, 2013 at 8:11 | comment | added | Fiora the Ferret | @Joe That assumes that the recruiter will be honest. It might be the case that the company has terminated the services of the recruiter himself, rather than this mysterious "contact" - in which case it's in the recruiter's interest to turn the OP away towards other jobs. | |
Sep 17, 2013 at 6:18 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackWorkplace/status/379851913095024640 | ||
Sep 17, 2013 at 2:13 | comment | added | jmac | @Joe I totally agree. Unless the employee was laid off for something like taking kickbacks from the recruiter for preferential job placement, losing a contact shouldn't make the recruiter want the money for placing you there less. | |
Sep 17, 2013 at 2:05 | answer | added | happybuddha | timeline score: 17 | |
Sep 17, 2013 at 1:25 | review | First posts | |||
Sep 17, 2013 at 7:36 | |||||
Sep 17, 2013 at 1:06 | history | asked | bengoesboom | CC BY-SA 3.0 |