Timeline for How to handle a scrum member speaking for too long?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2015 at 13:46 | comment | added | Lightness Races in Orbit | @crh225: Just basic human interaction, I would have thought :P | |
| Aug 6, 2015 at 22:02 | comment | added | crh225 | You hit the problem on the head. She is going more of what that task involved, the problems I faced and how I overcame them. I also like the idea of right before the meetings starts, all smiles and say, lets keep this short today! A little suggestive thinking. | |
| Aug 6, 2015 at 21:59 | comment | added | crh225 | Our company has taken over software from a contracting company. We followed their process for over two years while we learned and worked alongside them. In their process they had the release manager join the meeting, but he rarely said anything. Usually, this environment is now down/up. I agree its good to know she isnt going to be available, but we have instant messaging that lets us know they are in a meeting. | |
| Aug 6, 2015 at 21:10 | comment | added | Lightness Races in Orbit | Not sure whether this is a localisation thing, but in my environment to "take something offline" has evolved from a term useful in conference calls to a term useful in any general meeting sense, to mean "talk about it later, outside of this meeting". | |
| Aug 6, 2015 at 21:07 | history | answered | Lightness Races in Orbit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |