Timeline for How to deal with travel expenses of candidates who (very probably) lied to us on their resume?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2015 at 11:52 | comment | added | reirab | On the other hand, it's perfectly reasonable for someone who is considering moving to your city to take a job with your company to want to spend some time exploring the area before deciding to move there. | |
| Oct 29, 2015 at 7:07 | comment | added | jwsc | @reirab: yes, the last one is over the top. You can understand that any way you want. If you have many canidates which exploit your gratitude, it may help to cut that benefit of staying a little longer. Especially if OP's company organizes the trip (which he does not specify anything about) it may be much easier and cheaper to not grant any special wishes. He is no travel agency after all ;) | |
| Oct 29, 2015 at 5:15 | comment | added | reirab | +1 for pretty much all of this answer, except the last part (unless I am misunderstanding your meaning.) While I completely agree that any extra expenses incurred as a result of the candidate wanting to stay around for an extra day should be paid by the candidate, it sounds like you're suggesting that if they want a flight back later than immediately after the interview, it's up to them to pay for the flight. If that was indeed your meaning, if I were the candidate, I'd interpret such a policy as meaning the company doesn't place much value in its employees. | |
| Oct 28, 2015 at 19:46 | history | answered | jwsc | CC BY-SA 3.0 |