Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

Hi, we called this meeting because we have a problem. Motivation. What we're doing right now isn't cutting it, and things are getting bad. Now, we believe in what we're doing which is why we're talking about it now rather than walking off the job as a group.

 

These soft awards are nice and all...

Hi, we called this meeting because we have a problem. Motivation. What we're doing right now isn't cutting it, and things are getting bad. Now, we believe in what we're doing which is why we're talking about it now rather than walking off the job as a group.

 

These soft awards are nice and all...

Hi, we called this meeting because we have a problem. Motivation. What we're doing right now isn't cutting it, and things are getting bad. Now, we believe in what we're doing which is why we're talking about it now rather than walking off the job as a group.

These soft awards are nice and all...

added 2109 characters in body
Source Link
sysadmin1138
  • 1.3k
  • 11
  • 11

The Direct Approach: One on OneArgument

If your founders are the kind who encourage an open environment, breakThe approach to take when you finally get down barriers between decision makers and product makers, and otherwise state they're always willing to accept feedback,talking to them should be the same no matter what route you picked to take them up on their wordget. Be the bold one, and actually schedule a chat with them there.

All these soft awards are nice and all, but we're tired. Heck, Bob left because he wasn't feeling appreciated. And frankly, some of the others are saying the same things. Maybe we need some hard awards, with money behind them.

Since the investors don't want us throwing money around just for fun, why not do it targeted? Set up some rewards with money behind them, for goals we reach. That's not celebration, that motivation. Which we need.

Sounds like y'all hit them over the head with this once before, but nothing changed, so you may need to work that in too.

A lot of the ideas passed around back when we had that big meeting are still good, but nothing done since then has really helped. We need to do something different.

It sounds like they're perfectly happy with how they're motivating employees, but need a bit of reeducation when it comes to the worker's expectations for How to Have a Good Time With Your Coworkers. The buddy-buddy we all share expenses approach may be the only way they know how to do it, so pitching change will require a delicate hand. Repeated applications may be needed.

The Direct Approach: One on One

If your founders are the kind who encourage an open environment, break down barriers between decision makers and product makers, and otherwise state they're always willing to accept feedback, take them up on their word. Be the bold one, and actually schedule a chat with them.

The idea behind this one is that you, the firm believer in the company that you are, are coming to them with a problem that affects the business. And more importantly, you have a solution.

You may have to keep coming to them with this. One-and-done is rarely a viable approach when decision makers have their heads in the sand deep enough, it takes some time to change. Work WITH them, which will keep you in good graces.

Hi, we called this meeting because we have a problem. Motivation. What we're doing right now isn't cutting it, and things are getting bad. Now, we believe in what we're doing which is why we're talking about it now rather than walking off the job as a group.

These soft awards are nice and all...

The key arguments to make are in the one-on-one option: you need to speak their language (small business owner) and demonstrate a way out.

Secondly, you need to speak their culture. Where and how did they grow up (well funded vs hard-scrabble living check to check)? What kind of schools did they go to (inner city public schools, or private schools)? If there is enough of a difference between how they learned their social skills and how their employees learned theirs, it is worth it to underline this to emphasize why their methods aren't working.

The Direct Approach: One on One

If your founders are the kind who encourage an open environment, break down barriers between decision makers and product makers, and otherwise state they're always willing to accept feedback, take them up on their word. Be the bold one, and actually schedule a chat with them.

All these soft awards are nice and all, but we're tired. Maybe we need some hard awards, with money behind them.

Since the investors don't want us throwing money around just for fun, why not do it targeted? Set up some rewards with money behind them, for goals we reach. That's not celebration, that motivation. Which we need.

The key arguments to make are in the one-on-one option: you need to speak their language (small business owner) and demonstrate a way out.

The Argument

The approach to take when you finally get down to talking to them should be the same no matter what route you picked to get there.

All these soft awards are nice and all, but we're tired. Heck, Bob left because he wasn't feeling appreciated. And frankly, some of the others are saying the same things. Maybe we need some hard awards, with money behind them.

Since the investors don't want us throwing money around just for fun, why not do it targeted? Set up some rewards with money behind them, for goals we reach. That's not celebration, that motivation. Which we need.

Sounds like y'all hit them over the head with this once before, but nothing changed, so you may need to work that in too.

A lot of the ideas passed around back when we had that big meeting are still good, but nothing done since then has really helped. We need to do something different.

It sounds like they're perfectly happy with how they're motivating employees, but need a bit of reeducation when it comes to the worker's expectations for How to Have a Good Time With Your Coworkers. The buddy-buddy we all share expenses approach may be the only way they know how to do it, so pitching change will require a delicate hand. Repeated applications may be needed.

The Direct Approach: One on One

If your founders are the kind who encourage an open environment, break down barriers between decision makers and product makers, and otherwise state they're always willing to accept feedback, take them up on their word. Be the bold one, and actually schedule a chat with them.

The idea behind this one is that you, the firm believer in the company that you are, are coming to them with a problem that affects the business. And more importantly, you have a solution.

You may have to keep coming to them with this. One-and-done is rarely a viable approach when decision makers have their heads in the sand deep enough, it takes some time to change. Work WITH them, which will keep you in good graces.

Hi, we called this meeting because we have a problem. Motivation. What we're doing right now isn't cutting it, and things are getting bad. Now, we believe in what we're doing which is why we're talking about it now rather than walking off the job as a group.

These soft awards are nice and all...

The key arguments to make are in the one-on-one option: you need to speak their language (small business owner) and demonstrate a way out.

Secondly, you need to speak their culture. Where and how did they grow up (well funded vs hard-scrabble living check to check)? What kind of schools did they go to (inner city public schools, or private schools)? If there is enough of a difference between how they learned their social skills and how their employees learned theirs, it is worth it to underline this to emphasize why their methods aren't working.

Source Link
sysadmin1138
  • 1.3k
  • 11
  • 11

This touches on the core of how the founders are motivating their workers. From your point of view, it isn't working and it sounds like this view is shared by others. There are a couple of ways to bring this up to the founders, though it does depend on their personalities; if they're fundamentally not approachable about your only option is unpleasant direct-action (and most people would rather get another job than bother).

The Direct Approach: One on One

If your founders are the kind who encourage an open environment, break down barriers between decision makers and product makers, and otherwise state they're always willing to accept feedback, take them up on their word. Be the bold one, and actually schedule a chat with them.

All these soft awards are nice and all, but we're tired. Maybe we need some hard awards, with money behind them.

Since they're worried about the investors, pitch with them in mind.

Since the investors don't want us throwing money around just for fun, why not do it targeted? Set up some rewards with money behind them, for goals we reach. That's not celebration, that motivation. Which we need.

The Direct Approach: Many to One

If your peers really feel the same way you do, and your founders are kind of aloof (the previous approach won't work), it's time to come as a group. You'd make the same argument you would in the one-on-one approach, but you add more people behind it.

Maybe they need to hear the same thing from multiple people (iterative one-on-one).

Maybe they need to hear the same thing from a group at the same time.

The second method is big guns, and really should only be done if the corporate culture requires it ("feedback is done where everyone can see it") or the founders really do need a knock that hard to notice the problem.

The Indirect Approach

If they really aren't approachable, and you can't get backing for a group to present their grievances, you may need to get subtle.

So they want to take you all out for a weekend. Oh shucks, most of you have conflicts or can't afford it, sorry.

Once the workers have spurned a 'reward' like that, in such quantity, they may be better prepared for one of the previous approaches. They want to know why everyone suddenly doesn't care, and are primed to find out why. So you tell them.


The key arguments to make are in the one-on-one option: you need to speak their language (small business owner) and demonstrate a way out.