An email I had received as a part of a Reply-All chain included information not intended to me (or any of the CC'd people really). Is it ethical to make inquiries on issues that I wouldn't know unless I read all the chained replies in the email?
To elaborate: An email I received on a technical problem in equipment on site A (which is my job to know and followup). However, I was not included in the original email which included the same equipment being installed on site A and B.
From: Dan Technical
To: Maintenance group
CC: My Department group, ...
Title: RE:MOM with XYZ on Feb 30Hey can you fix equipment in site A?
From: Technical Manager
To: Dan Technical
CC: Technical group, ...
Title: RE:MOM with XYZ on Feb 30We have problem in ABC equipment in site A.
...
From: Sarah Assistant
To: CEO,CTO,CMO
CC: Managers
Title: MOM with XYZ on Feb 30As discussed we installed ABC equipment in Site A and B.
The point here that I wouldn't know about ABC equipment in site B.
Is it ethical (or legal) to inquire on equipment installed on site B?
EDIT:
My question is about inquiring on equipment on site B. Can I ask questions about site B equipment and prepare to have maintenance on it? (ordering spare parts, requesting layouts and diagrams), ie: planning ahead in case we get the responsibility of maintaining equipment in site B
Site B existence isn't confidential, it's just information I'm not expected to know if someone in the reply chain wasn't lazy and started a new email chain on the maintenance order.
Maintenance responsibility for site B is not (yet?) transferred to us. Planning ahead reduces downtime greatly since procuring spare parts takes a long time, and these parts can be used in site A too (same equipment). However I can't order extra spare parts for site A on top of what we have already in stock.