The Workplace Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for members of the workforce navigating the professional setting. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
As a W2 worker for a US company, my monthly pay was divided into 3 quantities: $X in salary, $Y in per diem, and $Z in car allowance. The benefit was that I would only pay tax on the salary, so my monthly pay is $X + $Y + $Z, but I would only pay income tax for $X.
If I change to a 1099, can the employer divide my pay into 3 different quantities, similar to a W2?
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
There would be no point in them doing that. If you change to a 1099, you decide what deductions you have, not your employer. Them calling some payment a "per diem" or a "car allowance" would have no effect on the amount of income you can claim as a deduction for business-related expenses.
To use a simple example, consider if you hire an electrician to do some work as a 1099 contractor. You'll pay them for parts and labor. They may have fees they charge you for transportation or other things. All of that goes into one big bucket -- money they got from you.
When they file their taxes, they report how much money they got from you. That's their gross income. Then they deduct their business expenses. If they bought materials for the job, the actual amount they paid is a deduction. If they traveled, they can deduct travel expenses or mileage. If the electrician has a home office, he may be eligible for a home office deduction, and so on.
The electrician will, we hope, have some profit left from the amount you paid him after he takes all his deductions. He'll pay taxes on that -- including the employer's share because he's the employer too. It makes no difference if you pay him $1,000 for labor and $200 for materials. He got $1,200 either way and his actual cost of materials is deductible either way.
Assuming your job control and responsibilities are the same either way, the main advantages of being a contractor are that you get paid more and have access to more tax deductions that you may qualify for. The main disadvantages are that you typically wind up paying more in taxes, your taxes are much more complicated, your tax audit risk is higher, you don't get any benefits like health insurance or a 401(k), you aren't eligible for unemployment insurance or compensation if you're injured on the job, it's harder to get a mortgage, and probably quite a few others I'm forgetting. At least you can't be fired.
OK, the first thing you need to know is that you're talking about being a contract employee, and not a contractor.
A contract employee would be subject to the policies in place by the employer. There is no "law" about what is and is not permitted for payments. However, you will need to report all payments appropriately and report all expenses appropriately. In the US, that would end up on schedules C and SE, respectively.
If you were a contractor, then you would be your own entity doing jobs or providing services to the company, and their policies would not matter, as it would be your policies that come into play.
