-4

I've joined a big company and after about one month still, I don't have any permission in production environments, but in the sibling team with another manager.

A new joiner has all permissions after about one week and knowing this made me very unfulfilling about this new job. I talked to my manager about this problem and he said I will get them but I think he resists about these permissions. Should I change my job (I like this new job but I'm in 2-month temporary contract) so changing jobs should not be hard but It's not my first choice.

I should mention that I have good experience in my responsibilities. How should I talk to my manager and aware him that if it goes this way after 2 months I will not extend my contract?

  • 2
    Why do you need the permissions? Is it affecting your ability to do the work that's assigned to you? Or is it a status thing? Straight up, I would be reluctant to give anyone permissions on the production server, particularly if they were a temp worker. – user1666620 Jan 26 at 13:22
  • @user1666620 It's a Software production environment job, so I need for example access to servers for better understanding of infrastructure, without this I can't work actually, I'm not temp worker I'm just in a testing period. – ᴀʀᴍᴀɴ Jan 26 at 13:27
  • Have you told that to your manager? – user1666620 Jan 26 at 13:39
  • @user1666620 yes and he told it will be OK since last week but nothing changed, I think he resists for this permissions and I don't know why. – ᴀʀᴍᴀɴ Jan 26 at 14:13
  • 5
    You shouldn't need to be able to access production servers directly and to go rooting around in there, that sounds like massive trouble in the making. What is the goal you are expected to deliver from rooting around there? – Tymoteusz Paul Jan 26 at 14:18
7

Sometimes permissions become a status thing. Your manager may not have realized you actually need the permissions you are requesting, and wants on principle to minimize their spread. If you just need access to a server to study it, make that clear because your manager may be able to get you read access without giving you permission to make changes.

Only request the minimum permissions you need to do your job, and explain for each why you need it. Also, whenever a task is delayed because you lack a permission, include the fact in your status reports on that task.

Do not compare yourself to other workers. There may be a difference in tasks. When I was a very senior developer I needed, and had, far fewer permissions than junior system administrators. Or it may just be that your manager knows more about computer security than the other manager.

| improve this answer | |
  • 2
    Exactly. Justify your request Please do not threaten your manager with leaving. Managers really do not like that. Nothing good can come of such a threat. If you decide the job isn't for you, simply move on. – O. Jones Jan 26 at 20:01
1

Everyone here is assuming a functional company with proper access control rules and answering accordingly. That is not guaranteed.

The other answers are correct on the following points:

  1. Permissions granted should not be a proxy for status/rank.

  2. Permissions should be granted based on job needs, not seniority.

  3. Permissions should be granted minimally, i.e. you should only need read access to understand the production environment.

  4. Different teams may have different permission needs. In my job, I don't have production DB access. People on other projects do.

Notice my use of the word "should." The fact that your manager is seemingly willing to give you all permissions (or at least never made the distinction in your discussion between read and write with him) makes me wonder whether any of that matters.

It is difficult for us outsiders to peel apart whether permissions are actually a status thing at this company. A friend worked at a company where anyone the boss trusted was often given the admin password to their computer so they didn't have to call IT. That wasn't planned security, just a sign of favoritism.

In one of my jobs, there were long passwords to make it seem like security was taken seriously, but they were kept in a plaintext file on the Google Drive for anyone to use. People who had their access restricted to that file had been moved from trusted to not trusted.

A person I met at a hackathon had a company where passwords were sent via FB. Whether you got admin rights to the server or not depended on whether the boss thought your personal FB password was secure.

If others on your team who do the same work have the access permissions you are seeking, then it could very well be a trust issue. If not, then it is probably a permissions management issue.

If it is a trust issue, you should probably depart because their threshold to trust seems low if a junior guy gets full permissions in a week.

| improve this answer | |
  • 2
    The formatting has got confused but an earlier wording was: "in the sibling team with another manager, a new joiner has all permissions after about one week". That could be a matter of the other manager knowing less about computer security than the OP's manager, or the other worker having a different job with different needs. – Patricia Shanahan Jan 27 at 0:26
0

You shouldn't get permissions to access the company's production environment unless you have a need to do so. "Better understanding of the infrastructure" doesn't seem a "need" to me. You say you can't do your job without this. Are there tasks that you couldn't do without access to the production environment? Did you go to your manager and say "Hey, I can't do this task that you wanted me to do because I don't have access to the production environment"?

You may be able to find out why your colleague got access after a week, and there may be a good reason for it. I would assume that you won't get access based on how long you are at the company, but on actual need.

| improve this answer | |
  • Actually, because I don't have a task related to permissions, but see infrastructure makes me more comfortable to request for a task. – ᴀʀᴍᴀɴ Jan 27 at 9:24
-5

Yes, it's a red flag. A recent newcomer has all the admin access, while you have nothing. That doesn't make any sense.

Your manager may have doubted your ability for some reason, your career future like promotion could be in jeopardy. Workplace is about trust. There is little trust here.

As you mention on the comments, you do require the production environment to work so you should consider have a discussion with the senior management, potentially the supervisor of your manager. It's not like the access is optional, you clearly state in your question and comment it's part of your job.

| improve this answer | |
  • 5
    The assumption that admin access is based on time spent in company as major factor is quite insane. – Tymoteusz Paul Jan 26 at 14:26

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .