3

I am working in a start-up where we have a team that consists of 2 developers, 2 testers, and 1 tech lead, that's me. Database design, UI design, and the workflow are decided and managed by our project manager. Additionally, we have two managing directors, but they don't interfere in the technical perspectives. Our project manager is managing the projects as well as he is one of the directors of the company. He is holding some shares too.

I am the tech lead, and we are all working in a very big project which has more than 50 Forms and 100 reports. We are a start up, I participate in developing too. As a Tech. Lead, basically I have to work on some tougher parts of the project. And sometimes I have to review the others code too.

Our problem is that our project manager is not getting satisfied easily with his project design.

He is feeling unsatisfied about his new update after being made by us. Meaning he needs more, not meant that he is unsatisfied with our performance. I guess that he is not making a satisfactory plan before initiating an update in our bigger project.

Whenever I get a chance to speak with him, I tried to explain the danger. But he is simply saying "I am also an ordinary human being. My plans may go wrong sometimes. In order to point/correct mistakes we have appointed you as a Tech. Lead." See, how could I do the assigned tasks with high perfection if I try to point out that mistakes in control flow of the entire project daily?

Is this a common behavior with all PMs? If not then tell me how to handle when he is making this kind of continuous unplanned updates?

For Example:

  1. In the middle of the development, or even after completing the testing, he is insisting that we change the entire UI/Workflow.

  2. Adding/removing database fields without forecasting the ill effects.

  3. Adding/removing features into the forms and reports by removing the existing ones.

  4. Assigning new work, which is not in the schedule, due to new modifications in the forms, Basically, he don't have a work schedule.

All of the above changes are made by him by referring to some other products which are very similar to ours.

Basically a normal software development lifecycle will be like this: (A) Analysis -> (DS) Design -> (DV) Development -> (T) Testing -> (R) Release

But we are working as follows: A -> DS -> DV -> DS -> T -> DS -> T -> DV ......... Infinity --> R

This leads to the loss of quality in our project. At the same time, our project is in the danger of getting out of the control. So due to this, once in a meeting we said this to the project manager:

"Software development and building a house are same. We cannot remove the pillars in the middle of the construction."

But he did not do anything towards our statement. He is continuing his job in the same way. I don't know if this kind of culture is common in all level of software companies. But this kind of behavior is making us more frustrated and making our employees' efforts useless.

Can anybody tell me how to convince him respectfully? If it is a common behavior, then tell us how to overcome this kind of situation?

closed as too broad by Jim G., Joe Strazzere, jcmeloni, enderland, MrFox Oct 31 '13 at 14:46

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 5
    Looks like a prime candidate for Agile development methods. Are any of you guys Scrum certified? – Hilmar Oct 31 '13 at 13:45
  • 1
    In my experience it is fairly uncommon for a project manager to have more say than the tech lead of a project. You should be in a more senior position than them surely? – Fiona - myaccessible.website Oct 31 '13 at 16:39
  • 2
    @Neuromancer - The project manager isn't satisfied with the plan he keeps coming up with -- his own plan. While the asker could mean unsatisfactory, from the context of the question it seems unsatisfied is appropriate. Hope this helps! – jmort253 Nov 3 '13 at 17:13
  • 2
    @Neuromancer I genuinely don't know what you're getting at. The manager is unsatisfied because he keeps changing the plan, and the employee has to figure out how to handle that situation. Not sure where you think there's an inversion--it's clear to everyone else here. – Amy Blankenship Nov 4 '13 at 18:17
  • 2
    @RajaprabhuAravindasamy - That sounds like exactly what I said. So the problem is you do not want to be Tech Lead? – IDrinkandIKnowThings Nov 7 '13 at 14:45