I'm writing a thank you letter for a technical position after the interview. I'm wondering if it's unprofessional to include additional explanations for a question that was asked in the interview; a question that we ran out of time to do. I know the explanation won't change the interview performance but my thought is that a quick explanation could clarify my thinking process and show dedication.

  • If you already know that explanation won't change the interview performance then how do you reconcile this with your thinking that this will "clarify your thinking process and show dedication"? What's the point of clarifying your thinking process and showing dedication if not to change the results? You're basically saying you know it won't change the results but you think it will change the results.
    – DKNguyen
    Commented May 31, 2020 at 7:35
  • I don't think interviewers are robots. Sure they will understand that they can't simply add +1 to my interview performance because I wrote them a quick answer in the thank you note, but the point of the thank you note is to indirectly boost your personal image, so then what's the point of the thank you note?
    – bli00
    Commented Jun 1, 2020 at 1:34
  • I suppose I am of the opinion that if you haven't convinced them during the interview, anything you do afterwards, especially anything not in person, won't change their mind in any meaningful way. I mean...put yourself in the shoes of the interviewer. Would it change your mind? In that sense, I suppose I do not believe thank you letters really matter. They might remind someone you exist, or make someone who already likes you like you more due to confirmation bias, but that's about it.
    – DKNguyen
    Commented Jun 1, 2020 at 2:16

3 Answers 3


I don't think it would be unprofessional, but I do think it would be unorthodox and odd. If it were me I'd forego including it in your thank you letter.

I don't think most employers expect you to be perfect and without blemish in an interview. Everyone, including the interviewer, is nervous. If you think you did well with the exception of this one question, then let it go.


As a hiring manager, I would not like it.

It would indicate to me that your thank you email is not really to say thank you. It’s just an excuse to try to re-litigate your interview. I’d file away the email and think 10% worse of you. “Is this guy going to be a high maintenance complainer?” I’d think.


As a hiring manager, I've seen this done. If the answer the candidate includes is concise and complete, this can come across as someone who thought more about the problem given, which shows me they're interested in the position and the problem. I thought it reflected well upon the candidate. If the answer is long, meandering, or incomplete, it reflects worse upon the candidate. I've seen the second more often than the first in these follow-up answers.

However, if you ran out of time to answer the question, it's likely you didn't demonstrate a level of skill that the employer is looking for. I time my interviews such that an excellent candidate will finish with time to spare, a good candidate should get through all the questions, and I expect that an inexperienced candidate probably won't get through them all. It doesn't mean you can't solve the problem, but it means you haven't solved enough problems like that one to meet their level of experience.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .