The Workplace Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for members of the workforce navigating the professional setting. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
Sometimes I get emails where the emails says:
Hi [SomePersonNotMyself] do you know what is causing this issue?
This is an email CC'd to me but the person is not specifically asking for my help. Should I chime in if I know the answer or just let the person take care of it?
Think about it. I have a question. I sent a mail to one or more people. I cc’d you. If you are the only one who knows the answer, what do you think I want you to do? Not tell me and let me waste my time looking for an answer because you feel it would be rude, or give me the answer?
Not giving a co-worker an answer that you know is ten times ruder than replying to a cc’d message.
Reply All is actually appropriate. Let everyone in the group know that an answer has been provided so others can stop wasting time looking.
reply all is not appropriate are almost always cases where a CC was not appropriate in the first place and a BCC should have been used instead.
It really does depend why you were CC'd in.
Sometimes it's an FYI, in which case common courtesy is to read and remain silent unless invoked.
Sometimes it's as a training opportunity e.g.
"Junior person, do you know why this happened?" Junior: "I'm not sure I think it could be X?"
Then you (as a senior who knows the answer) might say:
"Have you looked at Z and Y? That might point you in the right direction?"
Sometimes it's a matter of urgency and they are trying to get an Answer ASAP - in which case, expediency trumps courtesy - so it's okay to reply.
I would ask the person (if it's the same person) who is sending the original email - what their intention is, so you can gauge your response based on what they want.
Answer if you know the answer. That's why you were CC'd - in case you know.
Don't answer if you aren't able to meaningfully contribute to the subject.
I ask a question to one person so that person is the one responsible. If I get no answer, I hold that person responsible.
Other persons in CC are either to be informed or other people that may contribute to my topic in some meaningful way. I want them to answer my question if they can, that's optional. If they got better things to do, they should do other things.
I do not want the CC'd people to tell their opinion if it's not helpful. Noone but my TO-People should write "I don't know but I will research it".
You are in CC -> You are involved, one way or another. You can help -> You help and respond. You cannot help -> you stay quiet and listen
Different locations and even different departments have different cultures and conventions.
As partially demonstrated by the plethora of answers above, this is not a question that has a widely accepted universal answer. It will depend on the culture you are operating in, and here cultural norms could be as narrow as your department within a large organization.
My bottom line advice is therefore to ask either your direct supervisor or a more senior person within your specific department what the norms there are if they are not already clear from context.
For example, I am part of a law firm. In this field, often who said something and when can be very important. I frequently CC my assistant and sometimes the assistant of my target recipient. The assistants need to know to help maintain the records, help maintain the calendar, and sometimes provide other assistance. But I very much do not expect any of the assistants to hit reply all under ordinary circumstances. In some circumstances, if an assistant did answer I might insist the target re-send the same information because source matters. But that is my current office.
I worked my way through law school as a programmer. It was very much expected in that office that if someone asked for help in email, the first person who had the answer should respond and in some cases multiple different possible answers to technical issues would be provided in one email thread. The difference between "To:" and "CC:" never mattered there. (Though of course receiving something as "BCC" is either a mistake or a very strong indication that you should not use reply all!)
My suspicion from what you have provided is that you are probably in the second case and you should respond if you have the answer and no one else has. But in the end it depends on your particular workplace culture.
If you want to respond, I'd suggest you consider responding briefly to the addressee rather than the author -- "Hey, I know you've got this under control but if I can help just ask. I'm guessing they frotzed the bork before they gletched."
A simple rule of email etiquette is that if you are in 'To' line you have an action item or your input is requested. But if you are in the 'CC' line you are being included so that you are aware of the email and its contents.
Unfortunately, not everyone knows this or practices it regularly. This often leads to this type of confusion and misunderstanding. So in general terms, you'll have to use your judgment and follow the norms of your workplace.
In this particular situation, it looks like you have the information requested despite being in the 'CC' line. The best approach here might be to reply directly to the sender, not reply all.
Obviously, the nature of the information is important. If it's something of a sensitive or confidential nature you don't want to provide an answer unless it's within your job role and responsibilities. Defer to your manager if in doubt.
Be very, very careful. Depending on the situation, people may be addressed via To (primary recipients), CC (carbon copy) or BCC (blind carbon copy).
I know the question was about CC, but always make sure you know before you hit Reply All. If you were BCC'ed then your name/email address will not show in the email headers. There are multiple reasons why someone might be BCC'ed:
A regular Reply should never be a problem to any email. Even if you were BCC'ed, the sender knows they sent it to you and should be prepared for your response/comments/critique/etc.
But a Reply All should almost never (there is always an exception somewhere...) be done if you received it as a BCC. All the recipients of your message, except for the original sender, will be surprised that you replied. Depending on the nature of the message, that can result in some very awkward situations. Arguably, the fault goes to the original sender, but that really doesn't solve the problem. Example:
From: The Boss
To: Employee
CC: Direct Manager
BCC: Existing employee who may get a chance to move up a level in the hierarchy
Subject: One more mistake and you're out of here
If you are on good terms with The Boss and the Direct Manager, perhaps informed verbally about the situation so you can plan appropriately, then it may be perfectly reasonable for you to be BCC'ed. But it would be really, really bad for your to Reply All because then the Employee will know you were BCC'ed. If said Employee is simply not up to job requirements but is not a bad person (no stealing or cheating or abuse etc.) then you may have now put yourself and Employee on very bad terms.
I don't know the power dynamics of the company where @DarkCygnus works, but in the absence of an explanation as to why other people are Cc'd into a conversation, it would seem rude to me to Cc someone and then expect them to keep mute.
I will often start an email by saying something like:
Hello Alice,
I've Cc'd this to Bob, Charlie, and Dan, who are better qualified than me to investigate this issue.
Or in less cordial circumstances:
Hello Xavier,
[this is Cc'ed to Yve (my manager) and Zak (HR) so that my responses are on the record]
So I would take an unannounced Cc as an invitation to participate if I am able to provide a meaningful contribution.
If I am Bcc'ed (and not behind a listserv), then that's different: perhaps they don't want the principal recipient to know that I'm receiving it, so I should tread carefully.
I concur with the earlier responders that being Cc'd generally implies you are not obligated to respond, and to avoid responding with vacuous one-liners when you're only Cc'ed. But if you're really in doubt you can simply reply-to-sender and ask.
Lastly, phrases like "does anyone know X", "do you know X", or "who knows X" are English language boilerplate, not to be taken literally; you should not answer "no" unless you are the only recipient of such an inquiry or the inquirer says they need replies from everyone.
Let's break this into two parts
First, if someone in your organization asks a question in an email that you are included on, why wouldn't you answer? They need an answer, they included you on the chance that you have the answer, you have the answer. Don't overthink it, just give the answer. There may be reasons for holding back like not wanting to be the "go to" person for all questions, but whether you were included as a "to" or a "cc" is irrelevant.
So why might a person who could know the answer be included as a "cc" instead of a "to"? In some organizations, particularly bad organizations, if a problem is sent to a lot of people, they tend to have the attitude of "someone else will deal with this". People learn to put one or maybe two people on the "to" line to try to make sure someone takes responsibility, and then include anyone else who might have an answer as "cc"s.
Bottom line: don't worry about "cc" vs "to" when deciding whether to answer a question in an email.
Should I chime in if I know the answer or just let the person take care of it?
Since the person isn't asking for your help, you shouldn't offer it unless the addressee asks for your assistance.
