0

I work in an at-will state (Texas) but my contract says I have to give 1 month notice, and the company has to give 3 months notice.

Why would they offer more notice than the law demands? Presumably if they wanted to get rid of me straight away they would have to pay me 3 months salary to stay at home - or do American companies typically just find some legal excuse to fire people eg. minor violation of expenses or workplace policy?

On my side I imagine I can't similarly pay them a months salary and leave straight away. I am the senior technical person in the company and it would cost them a lot more than my annual salary to replace me and get back on schedule.

I am from the EU and used to fairly long and complex rules on both sides. How does at-will work in other jobs? I can't believe a 747 captain can decide to abort a take off and just walk away from the aircraft at-will!

EDIT: To clarify the question: In an at-will state are employment contracts basically meaningless? Do I expect a US employer to just fire a worker anyway with whatever legal justification. Should an employer in such a state also assume that key members of staff might leave in the middle of a vital task and have contingency plans?

  • You need proper legal advice about this, which falls outside of the scope of workplace. – Styphon Apr 6 '14 at 17:03
  • @Styphon - it was just a "general interest" type question rather than a specific case. I was wondering about the effects of being able to walk off the job in the middle of a task – NobodySpecial Apr 6 '14 at 17:07
  • 1
    You might want to edit your question then. Right now you're talking about which laws trump which, which is a legal question. – Styphon Apr 6 '14 at 17:12
  • If you edit your question, indicate what visa you're on, if any. – Meredith Poor Apr 6 '14 at 17:15
  • 1
    Employment contracts are contracts. 'At will' means that 'without any more specific agreement, either party can terminate the relationship when they please.' Your contract, however, states that you will provide one month's notice, and that is legally enforceable. – Meredith Poor Apr 19 '14 at 2:25
4

Why would they offer more notice than the law demands?

Perhaps they feel that the law doesn't demand enough to satisfy their sense of corporate ethics. Or perhaps they are trying to make their organization more attractive than their competitors'. Or perhaps it was influenced by large external players, such as a union and an important contractor/customer insisting upon such terms for one reason or another.

There are many possible reasons, but not enough context provided to know for certain which (if any) apply.

Presumably if they wanted to get rid of me straight away they would have to pay me 3months salary to stay at home - or do American companies typically just find some legal excuse to fire people eg. minor violation of expenses or workplace policy ?

In general the first case would be the most likely. To do otherwise would leave the company in breach of the contract, which would allow the employee to sue for those three months worth of income (and possible additional punitive damages, depending upon state law and the exact circumstances).

Most companies would not bother looking for some minor technicality to use to avoid the three-month notice period. It's more likely that a company that really wants to pay out nothing will simply do so and hope that either 1) the employee will not bother taking them to court and/or 2) they will easily win any court case that ensues, by digging up or manufacturing a reason for terminating the employee if/when needed.

On my side I imagine I can't similarly pay them a months salary and leave straight away.

No, you can simply leave straight away without paying them anything (unless your employment contract explicitly stipulates otherwise). Although of course doing so would be very unprofessional unless there was serious misconduct on behalf of the employer.

Technically you're in breach of contract in that case, but in no scenario does employment law allow a person to be forced to do something against their will. If you no longer intend to work there, that's pretty much the end of it. In essence all you really forfeit (apart from your professional reputation) is your pay for that final month. Note that your employer may decide to use any accrued leave entitlements that you have to account for your final month, which may or may not be legal depending upon locality and what is spelled out in the contract.

As in any case where a contract has been breached, a civil court case can be filed and nothing guarantees that won't happen. However, in order to collect in such a case an employer must prove damages. Which, unless they paid you for the month when you did not work and you refused to give that money back, would be very difficult to do (and not to mention costly and time-consuming in and of itself, and potentially damaging to the employer's reputation as well).

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    The 2nd part of the answer to this question is legal advice. Consider adding a disclaimer or removing it. – Codeman Apr 7 '14 at 19:29
1

Welcome to Texas. To the extent that the contract is enforceable, it basically IS state law, which in Texas unless otherwise specified is pretty much 'do as you please'. If you're working here on a particular visa, federal regulations are more likely to apply. For the employer to enforce it, they would have to take you to court. This is pretty unlikely.

While there are probably employers that will trump up reasons to get rid of people, it isn't likely with larger and more reputable employers, and even less likely if your skill is in demand. The 3-month notification on their part may be a kind of 'layoff insurance' - if they're on contract with a large aircraft manufacturer or government agency, this was written in such a way that a shut-down is 'graceful' - thousands of people aren't suddenly out looking for work in the same industry. It has less to do with you in particular than everyone covered in the contract.

You would not be expected to pay them your month's salary were you to walk away. If you simply quit showing up for work, they might finish out your pay period, but then discharge you for cause. The one month notice presumes that you are showing up for work and doing your job during that period - particularly transitioning your tasks to your co-workers and your replacement.

In general, labor rules are far more flexible in the US than in Europe, and far more flexible in Texas than in, say, New York, California, or the heavily union influenced areas of the Midwest. It may take you some time to get used to it.

| improve this answer | |
  • My introduction to Texas was that if it was profitable to harvest your organs, an employer would ;-) I'm pretty much vital so not too worried. – NobodySpecial Apr 6 '14 at 17:15
  • @NobodySpecial - Aviation contracts can be canceled for any reason at all. One trigger would be a situation where the employer isn't delivering, which happens from time to time, the other is a 9/11 kind of national disaster that forces reprioritization of various budgets. In such a situation the contract might be suspended until further notice. – Meredith Poor Apr 6 '14 at 17:17
  • That was the reason for my question. Employers will fire you when cost effective - that's capitalism. And there are decades of laws/unions to protect vulnerable workers. But now there are jobs where a single employee leaving can cost a company $M - which makes the "at will" interesting ! – NobodySpecial Apr 6 '14 at 17:20
  • @NobodySpecial - "My introduction to Texas was that if it was profitable to harvest your organs..." This is more what they have in mind: beaspermdonor.com. – Meredith Poor Apr 7 '14 at 3:30

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .