I moved desks and now I sit in a desk that previously belonged to a contractor. The desk had been vacant for a few months, since the previous employee was fired.

While rummaging through the drawers, I found some money - about $50.

Should I present this money to my manager, the contractor's former manager, or my bank? Please explain why as well.

I do not wish to put myself in a negative light, or to strain my relationship with my employer or coworkers in any way, however (obviously) I would like to keep the money.


4 Answers 4


Definitely report this to your manager.

He should make an effort to contact the previous employee/contractor and return it. If he is unsuccessful and returns it to you, I'd do pizza for your team, rather than pocket it, but it's your decision if it is returned to you.

{Edit for Enderland}

I can't believe I actually have to say this, but here goes: The reason WHY you should do this is that just because you can touch something does not make it yours. Taking what does not belong to you, even if you cannot determine proper ownership or locate the proper owner, is still theft.

  • 8
    +1 for the buy your team pizza idea. Good way of making friends :) Honestly, if I were your manager I would tell you to keep it, the guys been gone for months. If he had noticed or cared, he would have come back for it.
    – Jen
    Commented Aug 7, 2014 at 20:00
  • 12
    Unlikely to be this case, but sometimes money in an obvious place is an honesty test. Always better to turn it in.
    – Phil
    Commented Aug 7, 2014 at 20:51
  • 2
    Almost exactly what I was coming here to say -- the "almost" being that if you have an office manager, reporting it to that person is likely to be more effective. (When I was a manager, if I'd received such a report I would have turned around and handed it off to the office manager, the one who knows who's been sitting where, what furniture was moved around, how to contact ex-employees, etc. Unless the person was in my group, I probably don't know that stuff.) Commented Aug 8, 2014 at 22:47
  • 1
    ... why? This doesn't explain why it's correct at all...
    – enderland
    Commented Aug 10, 2014 at 13:13
  • 1
    @Brandin Just mentioning that sometimes honesty is tested by leaving money in obvious places.
    – Phil
    Commented Aug 11, 2014 at 17:07

Tell your manager that you found money in your new desk. I would expect you'd get to keep it.

On the flip side, if you decide to pocket it without telling anyone, on the off chance that someone comes around looking for it, you'll be stuck either telling the truth ("I pocketed it") and looking bad, or lying ("I never saw any money in there") and being potentially under suspicion.

  • 1
    Since the previous occupant of that desk was fired months ago, that's more than a few suspects. And no hard evidence as to who pocketed the money and who didn't. Commented Aug 7, 2014 at 19:56
  • 6
    @VietnhiPhuvan - This is an ethics question. Trying to establish plausible deniability is kind of cutting across the grain of what the OP is asking. Commented Aug 7, 2014 at 20:04
  • @WesleyLong It is indeed an ethics question. The threat of "being under suspicion" is not much of a threat - or a stick - and there is no practical downside to just pocketing the money. If the OP decides to hand over the money, I doubt that's because he was intimidated by the prospect of "being under suspicion". I am under suspicion all the time, and I don't even care :) Commented Aug 7, 2014 at 20:36
  • 2
    @VietnhiPhuvan You're right the odds are very low. If the asker wants to pocket the money s/he needs to be aware of the potential downsides. Letting the manager make the call has no downsides (other than potentially losing the $50 that wasn't yours in the first place). Commented Aug 7, 2014 at 20:48
  • 1
    @VietnhiPhuvan - This is why I pointed out it is an ethics question. It is not a question of how the OP is being perceived. It is a question of what is "Right" (ethically) to do, presumably for the OP's self-perception. I doubt the OP is concerned with how he's perceived, but rather in how he is. Commented Aug 7, 2014 at 21:51

If there's one thing that I've learned from working 15 years in an industry that has had some wild ups and downs in job availability it's that you can never have too many networking contacts who are willing to point you in the direction of a good job opportunity or who are willing to give you a great reference. If I were you I would try to track down the former contractor through social networking websites, explain the situation to him/her, and offer to mail the funds to them. You never know when you might gain a contact that will save your butt when the downsizing axe at your current company takes you out.

  • +1 for attempting to contact the original owner and involving no one else.
    – Mazura
    Commented Aug 8, 2014 at 0:18
  • 5
    If you do this, ask him how much money it was and perhaps which drawer it was in. Someone getting a call out of the blue offering to send him $50 might claim it was his even if it isn't. Commented Aug 8, 2014 at 19:04

To maximize global utility, overhead incurred from reuniting the money with its rightfully owner would be a dead-loss. I would argue it would be best to spend it on either a high impact ethical cause (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) or invest it in an industry enjoying incredibly high money multiplier effects (spaceflight or genetics).

Of course, that's what you should do with all your money, and no one does that. If you're optimizing in reputation, I'd mention it the manager and clearly state your intention to donate it to your company's charity of choice as ownership is unclear.

  • 1
    The ownership of the money seems reasonably clear: it probably belonged to the former occupant of the desk. Anything that doesn't involve attempting to return it to its rightful owner is, in my opinion, unethical. The worthiness of the cause you might donate it to doesn't change that. Commented Aug 11, 2014 at 21:50
  • "...reasonably clear: it probably belonged..." These are words of uncertainty. Regardless, it depends on the paradigm you are optimizing under. If you value right to personal property over humanitarianism, then by all means move mountains to return whatever money is found. But if you are, as I stated, maximizing in global utility, there's enormous efficiency loss to return something that doesn't seem to be that horribly missed. Failure to donate doesn't just punish a worth cause directly, it punishes yourself and your company for the time loss. There is no mandate monitor other's finances.
    – Calvin
    Commented Aug 11, 2014 at 22:28
  • 1
    I object to not even making any attempt to return it to the original owner. "Maximizing global utility" suggests that stealing money to donate to worthy cause (say, by embezzling from a less worth charity) is a good thing to do. If you want to consider "optimizing in reputation", consider the likelihood that the manager happens to share my opinion. And nobody said anything about moving mountains; I merely suggest making a reasonable effort -- as I hope someone would do if I had lost something. Commented Aug 11, 2014 at 22:47
  • That is exactly what maximizing in global utility is, and it is a good thing to do if you are a utilitarian, as stated in my assumptions. Likewise, under reputation I recommended a different course of action. However, any non-zero effort is an efficiency deadloss, regardless of what "reasonable" effort means to you.
    – Calvin
    Commented Aug 12, 2014 at 14:34
  • So if I accidentally drop a $50 bill in front of you, you won't open your mouth to tell me I dropped it because "any non-zero effort is an efficiency deadloss". Do I understand your philosophy correctly? Commented Aug 13, 2014 at 0:59

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .