I keep coming across people (recommended connections mostly, due to having connections in common) on LinkedIn who have been fired, laid off, "left under a cloud" etc from my employer but their profiles are still as if they work for the employer e.g. 2012-present for the dates. In some cases this is months or longer after actually leaving, and maybe they aren't employed at the moment.

In other cases the employment is correct but with an "inflated" title e.g. Head of XYZ when they are actually XYZ Manager or Coordinator.

Is there anything I can realistically do about this with my company, with the people or with LinkedIn?

Would this typically be considered similar to people who lie on their resume?

  • 20
    Remember Hanlon's razor: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." Consider the possibility that they just haven't updated their profiles, rather than consciously decided to misrepresent the facts.
    – GreenMatt
    Commented May 18, 2016 at 16:48
  • 9
    You can't control what people say or do, you can only control how you react to it.
    – Peter M
    Commented May 18, 2016 at 16:55
  • 13
    They probably forgot to update their profile and aren't super active on LinkedIn. I would say the potential for a detrimental impact on your company is minimal. Don't worry about it too much.
    – MK2000
    Commented May 18, 2016 at 23:03
  • 3
    @GreenMatt in my experience, it's often neither malice nor stupidity, but rather: created LinkedIn profile using work email address; left job; forgot password; can't log in and can't reset password due to no longer having access to associated email. Well, maybe you could call that stupidity. :-) Commented May 19, 2016 at 0:12
  • 15
    "I'm an honest person and it irks me" It sounds like you're not so much "honest" as meddlesome. This really isn't something you should care about, let alone act on. If you want to correct the wrongs of this world there are much better things you can spend your energy on.
    – Lilienthal
    Commented May 19, 2016 at 5:59

4 Answers 4


The answer is actually "Yes, but..."

...but first, even if an employee has left under a cloud, be careful that he has not made a private agreement with HR (or his former supervisor) to keep on working as a consultant (in name only) so that he/she could get another job elsewhere as quickly as possible.

And also, this is technically the job of your HR department. So if you're not HR yourself, I'd strongly recommend that you bring this issue up to HR and have them deal with it. That's their job.

That being said, the process of flagging a former employee on linkedin is fairly straightforward.

Three clicks and you're done.

enter image description here

enter image description here

Also if we're talking about a person who's using a title he never even had in the first place (for instance, let's say he was your subordinate, but he's listing himself using your title and impersonating your role).

Then there is this form which is used for reporting fake profiles and people impersonating others.

Impersonation can be a serious thing. Not only, it can potentially tarnish the reputation of your company and potentially defraud a new employer by claiming to having worked a position that the person never had.

But impersonating a company can be the first step in preparing the ground for a more elaborate form of identity theft, social engineering, and potential fraud. After all, this person probably knows all your vendors and probably has kept all those account numbers and/or cost center numbers, and such an impersonator could do a lot of damage to your company if he/she wanted to.


Is there anything I can realistically do about this with my company, with the people or with LinkedIn?

Unless you know the individuals personally, there's nothing you can do. Certainly complaining to LinkedIn or your company won't help at all in my experience..

I suppose if you are friends with the "perpetrator" you could say something like "Hey, I was browsing LinkedIn the other day and I happened to notice that your profile is out of date." That could work with some friends, but might offend others.

LinkedIn, while tilted toward professional interests, is still entirely self-directed and self-edited social media. It may actually have a formal mechanism for reporting cases where you don't agree with what is written. I haven't actually seen a case where that accomplished anything.

Users can write anything they choose. They can write the truth, or they can write complete falsehoods - none of it is vetted or curated. A quick search through folks you know will certainly show that.

I suspect much of what you are seeing is due to that fact that most people don't bother to keep their social media very up-to-date. If you took a survey, I suspect you'd find that most people's LinkedIn account is at least mildly out of date. It's often just "one of those things I need to do" that we never quite get around to doing.

I'm an honest person and it irks me that people are "misrepresenting" themselves in this way, presumably for some advantage. Similar to untruths on a resume in my book.

You can be irked if you like, but I think you are overdoing things a bit.

Perhaps most people don't put as much emphasis on LinkedIn as you seem to. I don't personally know anyone who would ever equate LinkedIn with a resume. That includes individuals, recruiters, and hiring managers alike.

  • Thanks, "irked" is milder than angry or whatever, but the reason I equate it with a resume in some sense is that recruiters are trawling it for prospects to reach out to, and presumably the usual cues (e.g. seniority of titles and "it's easier to get a job when you have a job") similarly apply..
    – user47059
    Commented May 18, 2016 at 16:51
  • 3
    @user47059, Do you really wish these people to have a harder time finding new work? Some people just treat linkedIn like a rarely updated "monster" profile. If it makes you feel any better, potential employers DO eventually check employment dates, so it is hardly fraud, and there's always the "oops, I forgot to update my profile" excuse. Admittedly, an out-of-date profile might attract more hits but things are hard enough for folks that have been laid off, there's no need to make it worse. Let it slide.
    – teego1967
    Commented May 18, 2016 at 23:55
  • This answer is incorrect. It should either be deleted or edited. See workplace.stackexchange.com/a/67383/14577 Commented May 20, 2016 at 18:21

If these people are intentionally misrepresenting themselves, it will come to bite them in the long run. You don't have to do anything. If someone's presence under your company header, is actively hurting your company, you may have a legal case and go after that person (like a person trying to steal your customers while impersonating to work for your company) but be ready to provide enough proof for that.

Other than that, LinkedIn is another website, just like facebook and/or myspace (does anyone remember that anymore ?) and you can not do squat about what others say or do. If you try to do something it will turn in to a comic strip I have seen before, where the clueless boss was trying to delete something negative (but true) about his company from the whole internet. You can only be a laughing stock if you try this in my opinion.

  • I call it the divine justice. But on the other hand, I somehow sympathize with people who do this due to the getting rid of the stigma of being unemployed.
    – MelBurslan
    Commented May 18, 2016 at 17:10

Leave Them Alone

How quickly do you expect someone to jump onto LinkedIn to declare to the world they were fired when you fire them? Especially when it's harder to get a job when you're out of a job? (And especially when not everyone uses LinkedIn all that frequently?) Is your absolute first priority when you get dumped to go update your relationship status on Facebook?

You fired them/laid them off/had them "leave under a cloud." In my experience the customary thing is that a couple months of not updating the LinkedIn end date to try to be in a better position to get interviews is done by many employees and tacitly nodded at by the companies (who usually don't spitefully hate people just because they laid them off).

Similarly, titles vary from place to place and there is no requirement to list whatever your official title said, just what they feel represents what they did. And they certainly shouldn't be contacting people saying "I work for company X and..." but this isn't what they are doing.

When they get an interview and fill out background information, they should certainly supply correct termination dates and their official title. When you get called for a background check you should confirm correct dates and title. But they have no obligation to immediately shout to the world "I got fired!", and a modicum of compassion on your part would see there's no real down side to letting that go for a while. Sure, if someone's been gone for 6 months to a year that's getting silly. But there are people that have left my current small company that I see haven't updated their title yet after 2 months and I have zero concern about that and wish them well.

  • No one is saying that companies shouldn't be lenient about this type of thing, I think they should be, but if the "inflated title" is obviously incorrect both in spirit and in practice, then the HR of a company should ask Linkedin to have that information corrected. After all, such a correction doesn't cost anything and it would prevent potential problems in the future. Commented Jul 20, 2020 at 18:59
  • Sure, but that is in no wise the spirit of the OP.
    – mxyzplk
    Commented Jul 21, 2020 at 0:29

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .