13

I founded a mobile application company with 3 other people, three of us took 10% while one took 70% and the title of CEO. We were ok with this because it was his idea and he had the connections to get us funding initially.

Now a year later I am running the company in almost every regard except marketing and fundraising. Our CEO who is generally unfit for his job is now a detriment to the company (everyone who works with us or has worked with us agrees). If he left "peacefully" I could easily continue running the company and I would have the burden lifted of having to go through him day-to-day. If I left the company it would likely implode within a week if not sooner (this is a vital point and not an exaggeration, we are a small team and I run most technical parts of the company that no one understands).

What are my options in order to get the CEO out of day-to-day operations? He can keep his % or something close, but he is destroying our company by acting as its leader when he is clearly unfit. He doesn't realize he is hindering progress overall (doubt he ever could, he believes we have gotten this far because of his leadership and organization) but he does realize I am essential to the company moving forward.

It has gotten to this point because I have enabled him, I want the best for the company so I have given him the tools and knowledge to lead us this far. If I stop helping things fall apart, I am to blame and my work goes down the drain.

I have contemplated leaving many times to focus my efforts elsewhere, but friends and family are invested in our product and if we succeed I believe it will be a very worthwhile venture even if I need to put up with the CEO in some way.

Edit: I should have specified that our marketing consists of poor/ineffective social media marketing and our fundraising was brought in equally from friends and family. If our CEO was doing a fantastic job in those two areas, I probably would not be here.

closed as off-topic by John Hammond, gnat, Mister Positive, paparazzo, JasonJ May 10 '17 at 12:37

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave these specific reasons:

  • "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies should be directed to your manager or HR department. Questions that address only a specific company or position are of limited use to future visitors. Questions seeking legal advice should be directed to legal professionals. For more information, click here." – John Hammond, gnat, JasonJ
  • "Questions asking for advice on what to do are not practical answerable questions (e.g. "what job should I take?", or "what skills should I learn?"). Questions should get answers explaining why and how to make a decision, not advice on what to do. For more information, click here." – Mister Positive, paparazzo
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 5
    Have you talked to the other owners of the company? There's a big difference between one person going to the CEO and saying "I think you should step back" and three people going and saying "We all think you step back". – Philip Kendall May 10 '17 at 8:40
  • 8
    The first sentence of your question is problematic. No, you alone did not found the company. The CEO and three others founded the company. You actually said "it was his idea". – scaaahu May 10 '17 at 8:46
  • 6
    @scaaahu Yeah, this jumped out to me in a huge way too. 10% is a tiny amount (relatively) - in every way this sounds like the CEO's company and this is essentially a mutiny. – Dan May 10 '17 at 8:56
  • 5
    "Questions asking for advice on what to do are not practical answerable questions.". This might also be a better fit for [startups.se]. – Lilienthal May 10 '17 at 9:37
  • 3
    I'm sorry to say but you were screwed from the moment you took 10%. The title of the question shows whats wrong; it's not your startup anymore. – Summer May 10 '17 at 11:27
36

I am running the company in almost every regard except marketing and fundraising.

What are my options in order to get the CEO out of day-to-day operations?

If you are a C-Level executive at a startup, you talk to members of the Board and the other founders, explain why the CEO must go, and talk about who should replace the CEO.

I worked at a small startup, and this was how the CFO ousted the CEO/founder and got himself moved into the CEO role.

Be careful here. Unless you can make a great case and unless you already sense that at least some members of the Board share your feelings, you might be betting your job on this move.

  • 10
    The only thing I would change in this answer is "you might be betting your job on this move" to "you are betting your job on this move. Excellent answer. – Mister Positive May 10 '17 at 11:21
  • 4
    If he owns 70% of the company, wouldn't any such decision to replace him need to be approved by him? – Dukeling May 10 '17 at 11:46
  • @JoeStrazzere I don't see how, in this case. The shareholders appoint the board. Even if the board fired CEO-Bob, Shareholder-Bob can just fire the board and elect himself to the Board. Then Charman-Bob rehires CEO-Bob who then fires Founder-Jerry. Further, Chairman-Bob can initiate a stock buyback from Founder-Jerry who must then negotiate its value, possibly in court or arbitration. Chairman-Bob then replaces Founder-Jerry and hires someone else, possibly giving him the newly repurchased stock as incentive. – Chris E May 10 '17 at 14:32
  • @JoeStrazzere I'm just speaking about the 70/30 split he talked about in the beginning. If the equity situation has changed then I agree but that's a pretty big detail to leave out. – Chris E May 10 '17 at 15:35
  • @JoeStrazzere My point is that he'd still have to ultimately go technically willingly. – Chris E May 10 '17 at 15:51
29

I hate to say it but it is his company. Your emotional attachment is remarkable, but does not change this. The owner of a car is the owner of the car even if he has no driving license and you have become a full-time chauffeur. As the one controlling the car you might feel that you are doing the major and most important work, but this is a fairly comfortable position to argue from if you sit in a car that you didn't have to pay for.

Your claim that he "only does marketing and fundraising" indicates that you might have no idea how difficult it is to get money for a mere promise of it being a good investment. People with great technical skills are a dime a dozen.

  • 48
    "People with great technical skills are a dime a dozen." No, they aren't. But otherwise: spot on. – AllTheKingsHorses May 10 '17 at 11:06
  • 20
    Having worked in tech for over 20 years, no, people with great technical skills are not a dime a dozen. The field is rife with idiots who pose as having great technical skills. I've made a career out of cleaning up after these alleged geniuses. People with ACTUAL great technical skills are a rare commodity. – Retired Codger May 10 '17 at 11:16
  • 5
    "People with great technical skills are a dime a dozen." Simply not true. – Mister Positive May 10 '17 at 11:23
  • 9
    People with adequate technical skills are a dime a dozen. – brhans May 10 '17 at 11:37
  • 3
    @RichardU I've met a lot more people with great technical skills than people with great management skills. It's all relative - what John is saying is that it's a lot easier to find technical skill than to find a person who can sell whatever these guys produce (which may or may not be true, depending on what they're actually making etc.). – Luaan May 10 '17 at 11:53