-2

I recently applied for a job posting online (via LinkedIn). It was a good job at a mid sized firm. I knew most of the interviewees (Linkedin circle, college friends, friends of friends etc), and in any case met all of them because of the initial GD Round. It was a group of 6 people during the GD and this was followed by a technical interview, coding round and HR.

At the end of the technical interview, we were three people left me(a guy), one more guy and a girl. The coding round was on an open programming challenge on HackerRank, and I aced it. Scoring substantially better than the other two(scoreboard was public) and the girl was 3rd out of us three. I went to the HR interview feeling very happy, and that too went smoothly. They asked generic questions like "where do you see yourself in 5 years, do you want to pursue masters etc etc". At the end of it, the woman taking my interview said and I quote "I think everything looks perfect. You should expect a job offer from us at the end of the week".

I was delighted, but as the week ended I did not receive a response from them and got worried, so I sent a very small mail asking about my status, but did not get a response. Two days later, I was shocked to receive a mail saying that "We regret to inform you that we are not proceeding with your candidacy currently". I was depressed as this was a complete shock and assumed that all three of us got rejected.

A week later, I checked LinkedIn to find that the girl had been placed ( at the same position she had applied for, and I was rejected for). I felt flustered. I tried to contact the HR, and one more friend in the company to find out what had happened. A friend of mine who worked in the company, very reluctantly admitted that the company had signed up for some sort of gender diversity program, which would entitle them to incentives (funds, reputation etc) if they could show that their team was diverse in terms of Gender. I brushed this aside as a mere rumor and sought for a better explanation form the HR and the Technical guys I was interviewed by. After a week of mailing I via unofficial channels (not a mail, but a direct message on LinkedIn) was contacted by the HR Woman. She at the condition of anonymity said that their decision was overturned by senior management who calculated that they could receive significant funds if they managed to hire more females, and that I was not the only one who had been affected. During the same time, the same had been done to various to various candidates who were interviewed for various verticals. She explicitly stated that if I were to reveal her or her messages to anyone else, she would be fired, and I do not wish to throw her under the bus.

What should I do? Is there even anything that I can do? Does the USA have any laws that can protect me against the same? I am too scared to publicly accuse the company of doing the same because a) I will sound misogynistic if I do the same b) I cannot rat on the two people, and without them I have no proof. This job was really really important for me, and me being a very young graduate from a less than stellar college do not exactly have recruiters running after me.

So my question is,

A) Do I have any legal recourse? Are there any lawyers that I should contact?

B) Should I publicly reveal the incident in order to expose the company?

closed as off-topic by David K, Masked Man, Kaz, Draken, Thomas Owens Jul 6 '17 at 16:09

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies should be directed to your manager or HR department. Questions that address only a specific company or position are of limited use to future visitors. Questions seeking legal advice should be directed to legal professionals. For more information, click here." – David K, Masked Man, Kaz, Draken, Thomas Owens
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 5
    Both of your questions are off-topic for the Workplace. We do not handle legal questions like this, as they are better asked to a lawyer. We cannot tell you what decision to make in terms of revealing the incident - that is something for you to decide, preferably with your lawyer. – David K Jul 6 '17 at 15:53
  • 13
    If this company is passing over truly qualified candidates to fill a quota, you don't want to work there. – Bill Leeper Jul 6 '17 at 15:58
  • 4
    And yes, of course there are a THOUSAND unrelated reasons you may have been not chosen. – Fattie Jul 6 '17 at 15:59
  • 5
    If you contact a lawyer, you will most likely be told one, or all, of the following: A) You have no proof. B) This would be a reverse discrimination case, and they lose. C) EOE and diversification equity quotas and incentive programs are completely legal. D) You likely are in an "at will" location, meaning the company, and you can hire, fire, not hire, not except, quit, etc. at will, without reason of justification. E) You have no case. F) If you insist on pursuing, they will take the case, for retainer, hourly fees, and a percentage if they by some miracle win. – dlb Jul 6 '17 at 16:55
  • 5
    And BTW, if she is an adult, she is woman not a girl. – HLGEM Jul 6 '17 at 17:50
11

Hiring is more than just acing the interview. There are a tremendous number of variables and there is no way you will be able win in court given this. These can include as you alude to in your post affirmative action. However, how you relate to the rest of the team, how you fit with the company culture, etc. are often variables.

It sounds like you are highly qualified and should have no trouble finding a place to work. Let this go and move on.

  • I agree. We have recently considered company cultural fit to be more important than raw qualifications when doing the final selection. – Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen Jul 6 '17 at 18:51
  • I agree that this is true, in the general case, but in this specific case, it's utterly irrelevant. It has been established that this is 100% gender bias and that the people making the initial decision were overridden by a senior manager based on the gender bias. – Brondahl Feb 23 '18 at 5:10

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.