Recently, I was in a technical interview with a QA lead with several years of working experience in this field. During the interview, the interviewer asked questions, which made me doubtful about his automation skills. I do understand that leaders do not need to have all the technical skills, but he is a technical QA lead. During the interview, the team lead asked meaningless questions on `CSS-Selector`, `Lombok`, and `Eclipse (STS)` which made doubt on his programming (automation) skills. I want to work in a team which the **QA lead** is a lot more knowledgeable than me. It gives me the opportunity to learn from him. To what extent do you agree with the following statement? > ***During the interview, the interviewers evaluate applicant based on his answers, and the applicant can evaluate the interviewers based on their questions.*** Obviously, I understand that the applicant also has the opportunity to ask questions typically at the end of the interview, but I believe I can gather an interviewer's technical expertise from their questions. The applicant definitely cannot ask the same kind of technical questions to their interviewers. Thus I believe the only way to evaluate the technical knowledge of the team lead is based on their questions.