Timeline for What happens when HR is the source of harassment?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2017 at 16:36 | comment | added | Pieter Geerkens | @Acccumulation: Not in Canada - it is a crime punishable by fines and even indefinite jail under Contempt of Court legislation as of the passage of Bill C16. | |
| Dec 23, 2017 at 16:26 | comment | added | Acccumulation | @PieterGeerkens Sexual harassment is a civil tort. That's completely different from fraud, which is a felony. And the executives in the Enron case were charged with their personal acts, not the actions of "the organization". | |
| Dec 22, 2017 at 15:14 | comment | added | Neo | @Peter I assume the CEO did not just start with the company and that the CEO is not an idiot. | |
| Dec 22, 2017 at 15:14 | comment | added | Peter | @IamSoNotListening You assume the CEO was at the company for 15 years | |
| Dec 22, 2017 at 14:54 | comment | added | Neo | My final comment, the OP needs to avoid this landmine field. | |
| Dec 22, 2017 at 14:53 | comment | added | Pieter Geerkens | @IamSoNotListening: That's why the auditors need to be informed as well. With this degree of unethical behaviour occurring, perhaps embezzlement is as well. Unethical behaviour attracts unethical behaviour. | |
| Dec 22, 2017 at 14:52 | comment | added | Neo | After 15 years, don't you think the CEO and HR are in sync, I mean unless he is totally clueless.... | |
| Dec 22, 2017 at 14:51 | comment | added | Pieter Geerkens | @IamSoNotListening: The CEO is an officer of the organization. For many purposes, in many jurisdictions, officers are jointly and severally liable for acts of the organization. Just look at ENRON. | |
| Dec 22, 2017 at 14:48 | comment | added | Neo | This section is what I am referring too "Not only will the CEO be very interested to learn that HR is endangering rather than protecting his/her butt" | |
| Dec 22, 2017 at 14:48 | comment | added | Pieter Geerkens | @IamSoNotListening: Isn't that what my second sentence says? It's what it is intended to say. | |
| Dec 22, 2017 at 14:38 | comment | added | Neo | This answer seems very naive to me. The role of HR at the end of the day is to protect the company. Helping employees comes way after that. | |
| Dec 22, 2017 at 13:54 | history | edited | Pieter Geerkens | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 278 characters in body
|
| Dec 22, 2017 at 13:49 | history | answered | Pieter Geerkens | CC BY-SA 3.0 |