Skip to main content
33 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 16, 2018 at 3:06 review Close votes
May 16, 2018 at 17:03
May 14, 2018 at 17:14 comment added trinityalps @gwp I'm fully aware. I'm counting on it even.
May 11, 2018 at 2:04 comment added user86764 Anyone who writes anything at work should assume their boss will see it. This is an observation, not a comment on the ethics of your task.
May 10, 2018 at 18:10 history edited trinityalps CC BY-SA 4.0
cleanup and shortening.
May 9, 2018 at 14:14 answer added user81330 timeline score: 0
May 9, 2018 at 11:45 history edited sleske CC BY-SA 4.0
improve title
May 8, 2018 at 17:21 history edited trinityalps CC BY-SA 4.0
added 252 characters in body
May 7, 2018 at 23:29 comment added solarflare The point of the above story (which is true by the way) is that if you feel people are vulnerable and you are in a position to stop unethical harm from coming there way then you should speak up. If that was me I'd say this is unethical and offer the contents of the DB minus the names. If management have an issue with this trust me that is not a good organization to work for, you're better off not being there. Just my $0.02.
May 7, 2018 at 23:27 comment added solarflare When I was in college I worked as a security guard at a hospital. One day a drug affected woman was sitting in the ER waiting room not harming anyone other than being an eye sore. The head nurse asked me to remove her from the waiting room as she had no business there. I refused, I said it would be unethical and I would feel like a really lousy human being if I removed a vulnerable woman from somewhere safe and threw her into the gutter. A short argument ensued but I stood my ground. The woman remained safe. I did not get into trouble. I felt like a decent human being.
May 7, 2018 at 21:13 review Close votes
May 9, 2018 at 11:43
May 7, 2018 at 19:28 history tweeted twitter.com/StackWorkplace/status/993573365066686465
May 7, 2018 at 19:27 vote accept trinityalps
May 7, 2018 at 19:15 comment added trinityalps @cdkMoose I cleared that up. it is a reorg and a job reclassification and consolidating a few departments, it's a lot of changes
May 7, 2018 at 19:14 history edited trinityalps CC BY-SA 4.0
added 181 characters in body
May 7, 2018 at 18:39 comment added cdkMoose You may want to be more clear about what is happening. I think many people assume "re-organization" is changes in management or department organizational hierarchy. What you are describing sounds more like job reclassification within a negotiated contract. Two very different things.
May 7, 2018 at 18:14 comment added trinityalps @cdkMoose the unions are really powerful, they have to be consulted throughout the whole process and approve all the new job codes, and I don't think any one will change unions. But they have a lot of power. I will let them know about the mis-identifying, but I don't know if they will care that much.
May 7, 2018 at 18:06 comment added cdkMoose @trinityalps, If you know it is mis-identifying people, you do have an obligation to let management know that the data is flawed. It's up to them to decide how to handle that, but you need to let them know.
May 7, 2018 at 18:05 comment added cdkMoose Does the reorg change the jobs of any union members? Why are the unions upset? In all of my years of working, reorgs were secret until they were officially announced. I wouldn't expect to be told all of the modifications to the plan along the way, only what the final re-org is.
May 7, 2018 at 18:03 comment added trinityalps @cdkMoose I am already seeing issues in the data collection, so yes, this system is misidentifying people. But I can't stop it.
May 7, 2018 at 17:55 comment added cdkMoose "Should be" and "is" are two very different things. If they click on a link in an email message that is pretty close, but the user should then understand that their identity is available. If you made some assumption based on machine owner or similar, that has holes.
May 7, 2018 at 17:54 comment added jean A survey auto fills your name on it must be clear about it or people will (wrong) guess it's anonymous, It's a trap!. Maybe your job is ok but the guy made the survey (and his boss) can be unethical
May 7, 2018 at 17:52 comment added trinityalps @cdkMoose I don't know what happens if I misidentify someone! it should be bullet proof, though, I don't know. It's a whole api thing. It's via email or windows login?
May 7, 2018 at 17:49 comment added cdkMoose How are you identifying the users without them providing their names? You may have a bigger problem if you "identify" someone incorrectly.
May 7, 2018 at 17:45 comment added trinityalps @jean it's through an online system that doesn't ask for the name, but it does grab the name on the backend. I am not using port info, but still, you don't put your name in.
May 7, 2018 at 17:37 history edited trinityalps CC BY-SA 4.0
Added some clarity to the situation.
May 7, 2018 at 17:33 comment added trinityalps @curt1893 it's a course on ethics in dealing with humans in regards to academic and professional settings.
May 7, 2018 at 17:29 comment added Sandra K @curt1893 My guess is that OP meant this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_protocol_suite, in other words, they can see which computer (TCP -> IP -> Port) submitted the comment (established the connection)
May 7, 2018 at 17:26 answer added Masked Man timeline score: -2
May 7, 2018 at 17:22 answer added cdkMoose timeline score: 3
May 7, 2018 at 17:19 comment added curt1893 This might not be important to any answers, but can you spell out what TCPS is? I can't easily find reference to it.
May 7, 2018 at 17:18 answer added Neo timeline score: 6
May 7, 2018 at 17:09 review First posts
May 7, 2018 at 19:06
May 7, 2018 at 17:06 history asked trinityalps CC BY-SA 4.0