Timeline for Responsibility when processing results of ethically questionable survey
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2018 at 13:22 | comment | added | dwizum | "But who is to say they won't fire those who are redundant and also hate the reorg?" Let me play devil's advocate here for a moment: Wouldn't it make sense (for everybody) that those would be the very people who didn't work there any longer? | |
| May 8, 2018 at 18:26 | comment | added | teego1967 | Management can clear this up by stating, clearly, on the survey that the responses are not anonymous. If they don’t, then they're attempting to obfuscate their intentions and that’s not ethical. | |
| May 7, 2018 at 17:57 | comment | added | cdkMoose | That may be true that people feel that way, but that doesn't make it fact that management will act inappropriately. Don't assume | |
| May 7, 2018 at 17:55 | comment | added | trinityalps | this is not to mention, again I have read many of the comments. Most people are afraid and do not trust our employer. There is already an expectation people will be fired over this due to being redundant. But who is to say they won't fire those who are redundant and also hate the reorg? | |
| May 7, 2018 at 17:43 | comment | added | cdkMoose | You're right, maybe no-one, but it's not unethical until something actually happens. We can't take action just because we think they might do something bad. There are plenty of situations where someone could do something bad and they don't. Lacking any evidence to prove otherwise, I always start from "assume good intent" | |
| May 7, 2018 at 17:40 | comment | added | trinityalps | Okay, but who would ever know? It's a secret, so if they do something shady, no one would know the survey was the reason for it. | |
| May 7, 2018 at 17:22 | history | answered | cdkMoose | CC BY-SA 4.0 |