Timeline for Major differences between direct hire and contract to hire?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 24, 2015 at 21:54 | answer | added | Dawn | timeline score: 1 | |
Oct 24, 2014 at 18:37 | answer | added | HLGEM | timeline score: 2 | |
Oct 24, 2014 at 10:25 | history | edited | user8036 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added US tag
|
Oct 24, 2014 at 3:41 | answer | added | Rich | timeline score: 2 | |
Apr 29, 2013 at 13:20 | comment | added | Amy Blankenship | For a recruiter that keeps the contractor in work? Hm, it doesn't take very many 8 month contracts where the "to hire" part "fell through at the last moment" before a couple of years have gone by. | |
Apr 29, 2013 at 0:15 | answer | added | user8365 | timeline score: 4 | |
Apr 29, 2013 at 0:08 | comment | added | user8365 | @AmyBlankenship - agencies can get additional compensation if a candidate does get hired. How many times are job candidates going to believe a recruiter who continues to promise "pretty much set in stone" and then fail to deliver? | |
Apr 28, 2013 at 7:57 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackWorkplace/status/328417554500562944 | ||
Apr 26, 2013 at 18:39 | vote | accept | CincinnatiProgrammer | ||
Apr 26, 2013 at 15:40 | comment | added | IDrinkandIKnowThings | Contract to hire means that they are bringing you in and if you work out they may offer you a job... | |
Apr 26, 2013 at 14:47 | answer | added | Xenson | timeline score: 11 | |
Apr 25, 2013 at 20:32 | comment | added | Amy Blankenship | I think it's not in the recruiter's interest if you get hired, because they make more money on contractors who job-hop relatively frequently. | |
Apr 25, 2013 at 18:54 | history | asked | CincinnatiProgrammer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |