Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 16, 2020 at 10:59 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Jun 15, 2018 at 21:08 comment added Captain Emacs This response suggests that you may want to consider payment in equities if you have doubt that money will be forthcoming anyway. Likely, the work you carried out may end up as sunk costs anyway. Getting equity, you make clear to your friend that you haven't worked for free, that that you "trust" his company idea - and if, unexpectedly, the business takes off, you even got your money. A way to keep your face, his face (and to pretend to yourself to have had a good business idea).
S Jun 15, 2018 at 17:57 history edited DarkCygnus CC BY-SA 4.0
Fix some misspellings, a wrong word choice, and convert an inline list into a bulleted list for more impact.
S Jun 15, 2018 at 17:57 history suggested amalloy CC BY-SA 4.0
Fix some misspellings, a wrong word choice, and convert an inline list into a bulleted list for more impact.
Jun 15, 2018 at 17:38 review Suggested edits
S Jun 15, 2018 at 17:57
Jun 15, 2018 at 16:56 comment added DonQuiKong “he's liable to outright refuse any future payment that he's not legally obligated to pay (which is why the contract is so important).“ - For the sake of completeness, most contracts don't require a written form and are completely valid by verbal agreement (should apply here). Of course, if you can't prove that agreement exists, that's a different issue. But the distinction is important, for example recurring trades between programming work and money and an unpaid piece of programming work would be a very good indicator that there was an agreement, even if proving the specifics is hard.
Jun 15, 2018 at 14:04 comment added Rui F Ribeiro To the OP: This is a very good answer. You are being naive and manipulated by a false friend.
Jun 15, 2018 at 13:49 comment added Flater @bednarjm: It is by far the proverb I most use at work, when people start mixing responsibilities/explanations. Just to distinguish, why OP's not getting paid in time may be important if he's open to accepting a delay for a friend; but that simply doesn't mean that he should avoid documenting the agreement in the first place. OP is better off giving some leeway on an existing agreement, as opposed to trying to claim that a non-existent contract was broken.
Jun 15, 2018 at 13:27 comment added JazzmanJim Plus points for using "Not your circus, not your monkeys." This is the main point. Why you're not getting paid in a timely manner is not important.
Jun 15, 2018 at 10:23 vote accept aMJay
Jun 15, 2018 at 10:11 history edited Flater CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Jun 15, 2018 at 10:05 history edited Flater CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1005 characters in body
Jun 15, 2018 at 9:58 history answered Flater CC BY-SA 4.0