Skip to main content
Corrected grammar, and added alleged to sexual offence (innocent until proven guilty and all that)
Source Link

OptimumThe optimum strategy is to go to HR and tell them "listen: "Listen - this guy havehas sexual harassment charges against him. Now he wantwants me to convinceconvince the ex-employee to drop the charges. AND if I won't do that he threaten me with firinghe's threatening to fire me. So not only HE will HE get two charges, in which one of which will be obstruction of justice, but THE COMPANY will get a third one for wrongful dismissal."

HR are there to protect the company and this "boss" is doing everything to make the company lookslook bad. This is not good PR and if this case will make justit look even slightly looks like the company is covering for the alleged sexual offenderoffence, the ship will hit the fan faster than the law team will be able to write a tweet with apologies.

Optimum strategy is to go to HR and tell them "listen - this guy have sexual harassment charges against him. Now he want me to convince the ex-employee to drop the charges. AND if I won't do that he threaten me with firing me. So not only HE will get two charges, in which one will be obstruction of justice, but THE COMPANY will get third one for wrongful dismissal."

HR are there to protect company and this "boss" is doing everything to make the company looks bad. This is not good PR and if this case will make just slightly looks like company is covering for sexual offender the ship will hit the fan faster than law team will be able to write tweet with apologies.

The optimum strategy is to go to HR and tell them: "Listen - this guy has sexual harassment charges against him. Now he wants me to convince the ex-employee to drop the charges. AND if I won't do that he's threatening to fire me. So not only will HE get two charges, one of which will be obstruction of justice, but THE COMPANY will get a third one for wrongful dismissal."

HR are there to protect the company and this "boss" is doing everything to make the company look bad. This is not good PR and if this case will make it look even slightly like the company is covering for the alleged sexual offence, the ship will hit the fan faster than the law team will be able to write a tweet with apologies.

Source Link
SZCZERZO KŁY
  • 15.3k
  • 5
  • 35
  • 43

Optimum strategy is to go to HR and tell them "listen - this guy have sexual harassment charges against him. Now he want me to convince the ex-employee to drop the charges. AND if I won't do that he threaten me with firing me. So not only HE will get two charges, in which one will be obstruction of justice, but THE COMPANY will get third one for wrongful dismissal."

HR are there to protect company and this "boss" is doing everything to make the company looks bad. This is not good PR and if this case will make just slightly looks like company is covering for sexual offender the ship will hit the fan faster than law team will be able to write tweet with apologies.