Skip to main content
19 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 10, 2018 at 18:35 review Close votes
Oct 12, 2018 at 9:01
Oct 10, 2018 at 17:57 comment added user25792 @paparazzo - Checkout the full privacy policy, and pay attention to what is under Information We Collect and How We Share Information. Once they "collect" it, it is their data. Why can't I simply submit my information for <Comapny X>, and not have to worry about Monster and friends taking it and sharing it? Why did <Company X> not ensure those terms were in place with Monster for their candidates?
Oct 10, 2018 at 17:38 comment added paparazzo Too long. Monster, Dice, or many of the other "HR as a service" provider? They are recruiting agencies. They don't claim to own the own your data. See the Monster privacy policy. monster.com/inside/policy/inside2.aspx
Oct 10, 2018 at 16:25 comment added user83977 I understand completely where jww is coming from. I have dealt with many recruiters where it is very clear that they don't care about you at all. You are an object to them, not a person. In fact, this is the vast majority in my experience. I recently upset one because I agreed to explore their offering, but I refused to give my current employer's information. From what I gather, this isn't so much about having something to hide as it is trying to force people to respect your peace and privacy (most third party recruiters definitely don't do this).
Oct 10, 2018 at 15:56 history edited user25792 CC BY-SA 4.0
Add additional information.
Oct 9, 2018 at 14:24 answer added motosubatsu timeline score: -1
Oct 9, 2018 at 11:55 answer added Blrfl timeline score: 4
Oct 9, 2018 at 11:21 answer added Joe Strazzere timeline score: 1
Oct 9, 2018 at 10:28 comment added bharal @jww i don't understand why you don't like the view "the person is the product". i mean, you are the product, you take yourself to work every day and use the resources you generate to sustain yourself, the product. unless you have a stash of case and start investing, you're always going to be the product.
Oct 9, 2018 at 10:26 comment added bharal @jww perhaps if you explained why relatively available data - your name, uni and work history - would cause problems? I'm unclear why you're trying to protect this information.
Oct 9, 2018 at 10:19 comment added user25792 @bharal - No, I'm not hiding. The intention is to withhold PII information from the third parties while providing it to the company only if the company is interested in my skillset and experience. In risk analysis, the third party is an externality that represents risk from my point of view. They don't benefit me, and they cause me harm with their actions.
Oct 9, 2018 at 10:12 comment added bharal what... are you hiding? your name? your work history? if you're on linked in this is v. easy to discover.
Oct 9, 2018 at 10:01 history edited user25792 CC BY-SA 4.0
Tweak title. "Aliased" sounded to criminal; "anonymized" is a better description.
Oct 9, 2018 at 9:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackWorkplace/status/1049585506940538880
Oct 9, 2018 at 7:25 comment added Mawg Since a few months ago :-/ But the "five eyes" don't leave much privacy for those in the UK
Oct 9, 2018 at 6:51 comment added user25792 @Mawg - The United States of Corporate America :) I envy European folks who have a right to privacy and a right to be forgotten.
Oct 9, 2018 at 6:40 comment added Mawg Can you tell us which country this is? In Europe, you would be protected by the [GDPR]*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Data_Protection_Regulation) and could require them to disclose all data they hold about you, and ask for its deletion.
Oct 9, 2018 at 4:25 review First posts
Oct 9, 2018 at 7:20
Oct 9, 2018 at 4:22 history asked user25792 CC BY-SA 4.0