Timeline for Is my document's subtitle an example of not being inclusive? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2019 at 4:13 | history | closed |
gnat jcmack sf02 Monica Cellio |
Opinion-based | |
| Jan 29, 2019 at 18:07 | comment | added | BrianH | It really seems like it would be a lot easier to say "sure, I'll change the title so as to make it more clear, thanks for you feedback" - then change the sub-title so something more specific and that isn't a quote, and then open the section itself with a properly attributed quote in full so it is more clear in-context. Or in most review processes you can ignore a comment you think is daft and only address important, substantive changes and hope the person in charge of the process has more sense. | |
| Jan 29, 2019 at 16:12 | answer | added | David Thornley | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 29, 2019 at 7:29 | comment | added | Mawg | Ach, mon, ther's nae need tae be sleekit, cow'rin' 'n' tim'rous, ye ken? | |
| Jan 29, 2019 at 7:25 | comment | added | Mawg | And "a-gely" sounds like "ugly", which is offensive to us differently-prettied people! | |
| Jan 29, 2019 at 7:24 | comment | added | Mawg | And I don't like that reference to gangs :-) | |
| Jan 29, 2019 at 6:00 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 30, 2019 at 4:15 | |||||
| Jan 29, 2019 at 1:53 | comment | added | Laconic Droid | A apt response might be "O wad some Pow'r the giftie gie us, To see oursels as ithers see us!, It wad frae mony a blunder free us" | |
| Jan 29, 2019 at 1:41 | answer | added | DigitalBlade969 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 29, 2019 at 0:29 | vote | accept | Craig | ||
| Jan 29, 2019 at 0:13 | answer | added | gnasher729 | timeline score: -1 | |
| Jan 29, 2019 at 0:08 | answer | added | PeteCon | timeline score: 25 | |
| Jan 29, 2019 at 0:00 | history | asked | Craig | CC BY-SA 4.0 |