Timeline for Is my document's subtitle an example of not being inclusive?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2019 at 15:41 | comment | added | DigitalBlade969 | @Fattie I think you wanted to post this comment to PeteCon's answer (; | |
| Jan 29, 2019 at 15:33 | comment | added | DigitalBlade969 | @LaconicDroid Morlocks, Eloi maybe? (; I would prefer gender unspecified sentient entities or simply meatbags pethaps.I mean, homo sapiens is also out of the question...now we just need to make sure everyone speaks english... | |
| Jan 29, 2019 at 14:29 | comment | added | Laconic Droid | @Fattie - "humans" or "hupeople"? | |
| Jan 29, 2019 at 13:59 | comment | added | Fattie | This is wrong. Regardless of whether you and I think "gender-neutral language is silly", the fact is and observably humans in the workplace may prefer gender-neutral language. Note that the OP would not write the report using traditional-language. So it is absolutely fatuous to use a historic quote ("One small step..." is the perfect example) which uses traditional gender language. The quote is nothing - a bit of window dressing. Pick another one. | |
| Jan 29, 2019 at 8:59 | history | edited | DigitalBlade969 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 463 characters in body
|
| Jan 29, 2019 at 1:41 | history | answered | DigitalBlade969 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |