Timeline for Approving claims although subordinate didn't drive
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2019 at 12:33 | comment | added | Borgh | Agreeing with Gnasher here, this is very much like the company paying the owners of efficient cars less travel comp "because they used less gasoline", this version is a bit more agreeable but still has the same vibe of penny-pinching. | |
| Jul 21, 2019 at 11:20 | comment | added | gnasher729 | The thing is that you raised a stink about practically nothing. Between the demotivation to the employee and the hours wasted by you, your manager, and possibly HR, what you have been doing is an absolute waste of time and money. Best case is that in the future many cars will be driving to the same meeting to make sure everyone gets paid, wasting effort and damaging the environment. | |
| Jul 19, 2019 at 23:18 | comment | added | Yaya | Didnt question the subordinate, she changed her schedule so that she could attend the same training as the driver. Everyone knows that the subordinate didnt drive. The manager doesnt want to approve it either when I told her I want to delegate the approval flow to her. | |
| Jul 19, 2019 at 21:47 | history | answered | gnasher729 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |