Timeline for Stop engineer from planning "bully projects"
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 25, 2020 at 11:57 | comment | added | Robert Andrzejuk | I don't get this issue!? In my company we have so much to do, that automation is the key in focusing on the important stuff. | |
Oct 4, 2019 at 3:11 | comment | added | user25792 | And to point out the obvious, the junior engineer came from your group. I expect junior engineer to be most familiar with your group's processes, so those processes are the first to be examined and improved. Junior engineer will move onto other projects and other groups after he finishes with your group. So to put things in another light, he is targeting processes he/she is most familiar with. They happen to be in your group. | |
Oct 4, 2019 at 2:39 | comment | added | Nelson | Regardless, you do not want to lose this new guy. He's not above the law, but honestly, this level of automation is really rare unless a lot of it was deliberately mucked up and made super inefficient due to incompetence, or assumed job security. 20,000% efficiency improvement is extremely rare. | |
Oct 4, 2019 at 2:37 | comment | added | Nelson | I think the elephant in the room is that Chan's team may have been extremely inefficient to begin with. You have 200 engineers sitting around wasting company time and this guy figured it out. This new guy is either someone that'll become the next Google, or Chan's team should've been sacked. New guy is just picking the low hanging fruit, because Chan's team made it easy to "target them" by being so inefficient. | |
Oct 2, 2019 at 21:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackWorkplace/status/1179501459613913088 | ||
Oct 2, 2019 at 13:13 | comment | added | fgysin | You should change the "junior" to "less senior" or something alike b/c according to the other question the guy was actually up for promotion to a similar seniority level. And calling him junior paints a completely different picture. | |
Oct 1, 2019 at 15:00 | comment | added | Solar Mike | This question as posted does not explain the full situation, just the last, well current, chapter. Taking the previous into account gives a different "view"... | |
Oct 1, 2019 at 14:48 | answer | added | sf02 | timeline score: 7 | |
Oct 1, 2019 at 9:26 | comment | added | user3238850 | Hello Mr.Chan, how about accepting change and going with it instead of trying to keep the status quo? Because, the only thing that doesn't change...is change. | |
Oct 1, 2019 at 1:59 | answer | added | Cloud | timeline score: 37 | |
Oct 1, 2019 at 1:55 | answer | added | Shadowzee | timeline score: 8 | |
Oct 1, 2019 at 1:54 | comment | added | dan-klasson | Chan still hasn't been fired or reprimanded? | |
Oct 1, 2019 at 1:40 | review | First posts | |||
Oct 1, 2019 at 5:19 | |||||
Oct 1, 2019 at 1:37 | history | asked | Pingh | CC BY-SA 4.0 |