Timeline for Employer says they want Quality & Quantity, but only pays bonuses based on the latter
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2019 at 2:29 | comment | added | Z4-tier | @Stobor sure, you are right and I agree. But that scenario is completely hypothetical, and it's not really the crux of this answer. My point is that OP should prepare for what is (in my mind) a very likely direction for this conversation to go: "What? No! That's not true, you are highly compensated! Don't believe such things!" If what you suggest is a viable way for OP to go in armed with facts, then great. If not, he needs to find some factual way to support this claim, because falling back on rumors and gossip will be a very weak position to argue from. | |
| Oct 18, 2019 at 2:17 | comment | added | Stobor | If the incentive scheme is public (bonus = $2 per 100 widgets produced) and the performance report is public (Bob produced 4200 widgets this month, Jane produced 5100 widgets), then it is possible to determine other's bonuses. | |
| Oct 17, 2019 at 15:50 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 17, 2019 at 18:15 | |||||
| Oct 17, 2019 at 15:45 | history | answered | Z4-tier | CC BY-SA 4.0 |