Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 23, 2020 at 18:30 comment added seventyeightist +1 for the different perspective, but I think there's a caveat here in that (my experience bears this out) generally there's a sort of implied consensus about what "conflict" means when it comes up in this interview question, which is frequent. As such depending on how it's presented, asking about the definition of conflict 'might' come off as nit picking, someone who will challenge the semantics of everything without really getting to the substance, etc. IMO the definition of conflict is what's at issue for the OP, but not as a frame challenge in the interview.
Apr 19, 2020 at 10:06 history edited Tim CC BY-SA 4.0
clarified a sentence
Apr 18, 2020 at 21:00 comment added Michael Durrant This is the real answer. The definition of 'conflict' is absolutely what is at issue here. You can finess this also with 'well I avoid emotional arguments when I have different opinions, I try to see the other persons point of view, ask them more questions, blah, blah, etc. But start with the question "Please can you tell me a bit more about what you are thinking when you say "conflict". An argument that left bad feeling afterwords? Is that what they mean?
Apr 18, 2020 at 18:23 history edited Tim CC BY-SA 4.0
original phrasing contradicted my point.
Apr 18, 2020 at 18:12 comment added barbecue This is the pragmatic approach. If the interviewer (incorrectly IMO) thinks a minor disagreement about how to perform some trivial task counts as a conflict, they're misusing the word, so you need to understand what they're really asking about.
Apr 18, 2020 at 9:49 history answered Tim CC BY-SA 4.0