Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 22, 2020 at 0:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackWorkplace/status/1274854654455750663
Jun 9, 2020 at 14:02 comment added user82352 Did not see the MIT license mentioned. My apologies :)
Jun 9, 2020 at 9:58 comment added sleske @KingDuken: Actually, it does, at least according to the most widely accepted definition of "open source" (The Open Source Definition): "The license shall not require a royalty [...]".
Jun 7, 2020 at 9:21 vote accept seg
Jun 6, 2020 at 18:47 answer added gnasher729 timeline score: 5
Jun 6, 2020 at 17:15 comment added Simon B The MIT licence does not require you to inform the copyright holder that you are using their work. I don't see how informing them could achieve anything here.
Jun 6, 2020 at 16:34 comment added Patricia Shanahan Assuming your use of the code conforms to its license, there is an intermediate position of informing your employer without asking for permission.
Jun 6, 2020 at 14:49 comment added seg @KingDuken well the MIT license explicitly allows everyone (free of charge) to sell and modify the code to their needs, without needing to publish the source. Only requirement being to include the license for the parts that are being used. And there are no software patents. So it is royalty free. Otherwise basically every project that pulls in popular open source libraries would need to pay royalties. There are other open source licenses of course. But that's irrelevant for my case.
Jun 6, 2020 at 14:32 review Close votes
Jun 17, 2020 at 12:44
Jun 6, 2020 at 14:26 comment added user82352 Open source does not mean royalty free!
Jun 6, 2020 at 13:20 review First posts
Jun 7, 2020 at 0:19
Jun 6, 2020 at 13:18 comment added jmoreno Talk to a lawyer
Jun 6, 2020 at 13:14 history asked seg CC BY-SA 4.0