Timeline for Do I have to relinquish my sign on and passwords for websites pertaining to work (ie: access to insurance companies and medicare)?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2021 at 22:24 | comment | added | David | OP stated "We don't have company emails" so this is not applicable. | |
| Mar 15, 2021 at 6:09 | comment | added | Stephan Branczyk | And I can't speak for NY, but in California at least, the Department of Labor can even go after the personal assets of the board of Directors (but again, that's assuming you file your wage theft complaint before they file for bankruptcy, and that's in California at least). | |
| Mar 15, 2021 at 6:04 | comment | added | Stephan Branczyk | Not only it's normal not to work during your notice period, but they always pay you as well. If they don't pay you within your normal pay cycle (and assuming that you're a W2 worker), you complain to the Department of Labor for your State, and the company has to pay you immediately + has to pay a large fine on top of it (unfortunately, you don't get the large fine, the government gets that part, but you do get the original amount they owed you). The Department of Labor can even preempt bankruptcy proceedings, assuming you filed your official complaint before the company files for bankruptcy. | |
| Mar 13, 2021 at 3:33 | comment | added | Donald | It’s normal for a company in the US to ask an employee to NOT finish their 2 week notice. NY is an “work at will” state | |
| Mar 12, 2021 at 21:51 | comment | added | DJClayworth | The OP doesn't say they weren't paid for the two weeks, just that they didn't have to come in for the two weeks. That is absolutely normal, and beneficial for the OP. (If they weren't paid then that's illegal, and an entirely different question.) | |
| Mar 12, 2021 at 19:41 | comment | added | sf02 | The company chose not to honor the OP's two weeks notice, so petty or not why should the OP honor the former company's request? | |
| Mar 12, 2021 at 19:29 | comment | added | DJClayworth | So OP is going to refuse to do something that will take them a couple of minutes and save the company much more than that, just to spite them? That sounds petty to me. | |
| Mar 12, 2021 at 19:24 | comment | added | sf02 | @DJClayworth The point is that it is that the employer asked the OP not to come in anymore. Presumably they will no longer be paid so why should they continue to do work for the company? | |
| Mar 12, 2021 at 18:59 | comment | added | DJClayworth | What is the point of making them go through this? | |
| Mar 12, 2021 at 18:33 | history | answered | sf02 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |