Timeline for Employee effectively not working during notice period
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2021 at 15:19 | comment | added | Edwin Buck | @mcalex Being a native speaker of English, the only parts of the CoC that might have been violated are the parts pertaining to friendliness. That said, there are a few people who mistake the message with the delivery. For those people, stating that they are making a dumb premise cannot be said in a friendly way, In either case, I see this a much less harsh than what could have been said, and must less harsh than the CoC examples. Honestly, if the person is being let go for performance, attempting performance out of them in the final weeks is just dumb. | |
| Aug 4, 2021 at 8:15 | comment | added | mcalex | @EdwinBuck all of that is entirely conveyed within the first two sentences (ending in 'moment.' - I'm not sure if the overused ellipses represent separate sentences) The rest of the answer is superfluous and not in alignment with the CoC. | |
| Aug 3, 2021 at 5:40 | comment | added | Edwin Buck | @mcalex In this case, I really do think the sarcasm was appropriate. To say it without the sarcasm would probably require the words that plainly stated how dunderheaded the entire idea of making an employee productive through termination is. | |
| May 15, 2021 at 5:06 | comment | added | candied_orange | @mcalex I don't think that word means what you think it means. | |
| May 14, 2021 at 19:33 | comment | added | Frank Hopkins | @mcalex sarcasm is a good in itself though ;P What I do see however is a misconception, they expected the terminated employee to work at the same underperforming level as before, but now they are even more underperforming (which is still something that one might perhaps not expect to happen but at least should calculate in as a possibility). | |
| May 14, 2021 at 15:44 | comment | added | mcalex | Entirely unnecessary sarcasm. | |
| May 12, 2021 at 21:47 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| May 13, 2021 at 0:16 | |||||
| May 12, 2021 at 16:51 | history | answered | Ian Kemp | CC BY-SA 4.0 |