Timeline for When dealing with mass misconduct, how do you prevent disruption while still punishing the act?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2021 at 11:38 | comment | added | Matthew Gaiser | @TheoTiger yeah, taking action this round and doing anything about it could cause so many impacts down the road. If this is an annual certification, this entire thing can be resolved very quietly within a year when they re-test under proctored conditions. | |
| May 29, 2021 at 23:23 | comment | added | Theo Tiger | +1. This question really needed a de-escalating answer. | |
| May 28, 2021 at 9:54 | comment | added | Buttonwood | As an extension of this answer, some schools use on-line proctoring. In this example, volunteering attendees was given the choice to submit their exam with optional proctoring to earn a then qualified certificate (which includes course details, how many points of maximal points x were achieved + name and photo of the attendee), e.g. with 2 ECTS credit points instead of a standard certificate. | |
| May 28, 2021 at 0:31 | history | edited | Matthew Gaiser | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| May 28, 2021 at 0:17 | history | answered | Matthew Gaiser | CC BY-SA 4.0 |