Skip to main content
29 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 9, 2023 at 17:56 vote accept Vitality7003
Mar 8, 2023 at 16:29 answer added bethlakshmi timeline score: 1
Mar 6, 2023 at 1:21 history reopened DJClayworth
Joe Strazzere
Michael McFarlane
TheDemonLord
keshlam
S Mar 2, 2023 at 18:49 history suggested muru CC BY-SA 4.0
add more context to the title
Mar 2, 2023 at 15:50 comment added DJClayworth Not opinion based. The offer is not "exploitative". Whether the OP should accept it is another matter.
Mar 2, 2023 at 15:49 review Reopen votes
Mar 6, 2023 at 1:30
Mar 2, 2023 at 15:33 history closed Philip Kendall
gnat
keshlam
Solar Mike
Dmitry Grigoryev
Opinion-based
Mar 2, 2023 at 14:10 answer added Robert Dundon timeline score: 4
Mar 2, 2023 at 14:01 answer added mhoran_psprep timeline score: 1
Mar 2, 2023 at 13:10 answer added Allure timeline score: 2
Mar 2, 2023 at 11:29 comment added slebetman They're not asking you to do 2 jobs. They're asking you to split your time/effort between 2 jobs. In theory this would be 50/50 so in total it's still one job worth of time/effort. Do note however that any time you try to do something 50/50 you tend to end up needing to do 60/60 - you'll need to work 120% or more of your regular effort because juggling between tasks also take effort. It's up to you weather it's worth doing the additional effort for the next 6 months or not. But from the point of view of your employer all they are asking from you is 50/50.
Mar 2, 2023 at 9:42 comment added nvoigt Can you explain what you feel is the "exploitative" part of that offer? It seems you would work the same hours and for the same money as you do today, right? Would the new role be so significantly different in those regards, that working your old hours for your old salary would be "exploiting" you?
Mar 2, 2023 at 8:05 comment added Michael The only danger with a 50/50 project split is that you end up feeling stressed and pressured in both. Make sure to manage your time and expectations appropriately.
Mar 2, 2023 at 6:49 review Suggested edits
S Mar 2, 2023 at 18:49
Mar 2, 2023 at 5:09 history became hot network question
Mar 1, 2023 at 23:20 comment added Hilmar The offer is perfectly reasonable and fair. Establishing a new role in a company generally requires someone who is flexible, can improvise and is reasonably comfortable with ambiguity and risk. You need to decide whether you want/can be that person or not. If you are looking for a guaranteed reward, this is not the role for you.
Mar 1, 2023 at 22:07 comment added Michael McFarlane BTW, I disagree with closing this question for the opinion-based response. This question has broad application and is no more opinion-driven than typical questions here.
Mar 1, 2023 at 21:54 answer added GrowITSupport timeline score: -1
Mar 1, 2023 at 21:44 history edited Vitality7003 CC BY-SA 4.0
clarification
Mar 1, 2023 at 21:39 comment added Vitality7003 That's fair! will adjust the post
Mar 1, 2023 at 21:32 answer added Michael McFarlane timeline score: 34
Mar 1, 2023 at 21:26 comment added Michael McFarlane Nothing I read suggests you are doing the work of two people. It sounds like you are half-time on one project and half time on another. That's very typical. If my impression is wrong, please clarify the post.
Mar 1, 2023 at 21:26 review Close votes
Mar 2, 2023 at 15:36
Mar 1, 2023 at 21:24 comment added Vitality7003 I do plan on saying no, I just want second opinions on this situation!
Mar 1, 2023 at 21:18 answer added TheDemonLord timeline score: 10
Mar 1, 2023 at 21:09 comment added Philip Kendall If you're not happy with the offer, just say "no".
Mar 1, 2023 at 21:06 history edited Vitality7003 CC BY-SA 4.0
fixed explanation
S Mar 1, 2023 at 21:04 review First questions
Mar 1, 2023 at 21:18
S Mar 1, 2023 at 21:04 history asked Vitality7003 CC BY-SA 4.0