Timeline for What is the protocol for applying for a job that you previously never heard back from?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2019 at 23:44 | comment | added | Jake | Objectively, I think it would be a good idea to apply, especially if it is a different position or if your resume was updated since then. Subjectively, I probably wouldn't care about applying, but of course it's a matter of personal preferences. | |
| Apr 11, 2014 at 18:49 | answer | added | thursdaysgeek | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 11, 2014 at 18:34 | comment | added | DA. | @JoeStrazzere I agree with you. And that sounds plausible. That said (just griping here) how can I take a hint when none was ever given to me? (I just do not like companies that can't even say "thanks for your resume, we'll take a look") | |
| Apr 11, 2014 at 17:58 | comment | added | Vietnhi Phuvan | If my quals changed in that time interval of several months, I'd reapply - but with updated resume and updated cover letter. It's most probably useless to reapply with the same resume and cover letter that you used the last time and that they used to screen you out, because both (and the decision not to go forward and the rationale for the decision not to go forward) are probably in HR's database. | |
| Apr 11, 2014 at 17:52 | comment | added | DA. | @JoeStrazzere is there any downside to re-applying for the same position (other than potentially wasting my time)? | |
| Apr 11, 2014 at 17:40 | history | asked | DA. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |