Timeline for Recruiter lied to me regarding relocation package
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2014 at 16:19 | history | edited | Vietnhi Phuvan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 673 characters in body
|
| May 1, 2014 at 15:43 | comment | added | user19170 | So the company got back to me and said they did not think I was being unprofessional. That is a relief. Secondly, they are paying my relocation costs. Sadly, I do not know what happens to the recruiter, but a good guess he is no longer associated with my new employer. | |
| May 1, 2014 at 12:56 | vote | accept | user19170 | ||
| May 1, 2014 at 5:36 | comment | added | Vietnhi Phuvan | @aroth True, but your proposed action could be seen from inside the company's hierarchy as a break from its policy of not giving out relocation packages. Another problem that I see is that recruiters don't get paid right away - There is a period of say three months before the company decides that the candidate is working out, and the company pays the fee. Needless to say, the candidate needs the relocation package now not three months from now. And the final consideration is that the company might take exception to solving a problem that it did not create. Let's see what happens next :) | |
| May 1, 2014 at 5:15 | comment | added | aroth | It seems the simplest thing for the company to do would be to 1) not pay the recruiter his normal fee on the basis that he acted inappropriately and then 2) give that money to the OP as the "relocation package". | |
| May 1, 2014 at 5:13 | history | edited | Vietnhi Phuvan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 19 characters in body
|
| May 1, 2014 at 5:03 | history | answered | Vietnhi Phuvan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |