Timeline for How do you incentivise developers without upsetting testers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2014 at 23:45 | comment | added | user8365 | @Pepone - No one is saying testers wouldn't benefit, the company may not have the funds to buy dual monitors for everyone. | |
| Jun 2, 2014 at 22:52 | comment | added | Pepone | Why would not a tester not need two screens one to run the thing the are testing and one for the system were they document their findings | |
| Jun 2, 2014 at 20:25 | comment | added | HLGEM | Although based on conversations with our testers, I think they too would find two screens would improve productivity. YMMV of course. However, you don't want to lose good testers either, so asking them what perks they feel they need would be helpful. While giving the exact same perks may not be needed, asking them what perk they would like instead makes them feel more as if you think they are important. Giving one group perks and ignoring the others is a sure way to cause resentment even if they didn't want the perk. It says, you aren't important enough to spend money on. | |
| Jun 2, 2014 at 18:57 | history | answered | user8365 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |