Skip to main content
5 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 24, 2015 at 14:45 comment added gnasher729 @BenVoigt: It doesn't matter what happens to other women. What matters is what happens to that woman. If she wasn't married, she wouldn't be fired. It doesn't matter that it depends on the person she married, fact is that the CEO wants to fire her because she is getting married and wouldn't want to fire her if she didn't get married.
Feb 23, 2015 at 4:54 comment added reirab I also agree that this is not protected by the CRA. The CRA says you can't be terminated due to whether or not you're married. It doesn't say you can't be terminated for a potential conflict of interest (though I would question whether a QA and a dev is really a serious conflict of interest... a supervisor and a subordinate is another matter, though.)
Feb 23, 2015 at 1:47 comment added Loren Pechtel I agree with Ben, they are not protected this way.
Feb 23, 2015 at 1:25 comment added Ben Voigt On the other hand, don't automatically assume that this falls under the category of "marital status". There is big difference between "married or not" vs "married to another employee". Professional legal advice would be in order before taking such an action (OP, who is not taking the action, has much less to be concerned about in that direction)
Feb 23, 2015 at 0:01 history answered Daveo CC BY-SA 3.0