Timeline for Is interviewing a potential peer any different from a normal interview, and are there any particularly useful questions to ask?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2015 at 5:21 | vote | accept | Doktor J | ||
| Feb 25, 2015 at 7:01 | comment | added | Brandin | Until they're hired you are in some sense their superior. And after they're hired most would still consider yourself senior to them and in some sense superior until one of you is promoted. | |
| Feb 25, 2015 at 3:50 | answer | added | watercooler | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 25, 2015 at 2:34 | answer | added | user13659 | timeline score: 6 | |
| Feb 24, 2015 at 23:02 | comment | added | keshlam | I haven't found interviewing a potential superior to be very different from interviewing a peer or subordinate. You need to understand their job well enough to ask good questions (or well enough to do a mostly non-directive interview, which is a somewhat uncommon skill) and to evaluate their answers . You're trying to determine how good a fit they are for the company and the position, whether they're good at working in your context, team skills, leadership skills, their future direction and how happy they'll be in the job... same ol' same ol'. | |
| Feb 24, 2015 at 22:20 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 25, 2015 at 17:46 | |||||
| Feb 24, 2015 at 22:20 | history | asked | Doktor J | CC BY-SA 3.0 |