Timeline for Is there a significant difference in the titles "Vice President" and "Director"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 24 at 2:34 | comment | added | Job_September_2020 | Usually, VP is the boss of Director. | |
Jan 1, 2016 at 18:56 | vote | accept | Stephen Collings | ||
Dec 14, 2015 at 14:39 | comment | added | Stephen Collings | For more context, this company has about 60 employees. Twelve work under me. The VPs have six and forty respectively. I'm the highest paid employee. | |
Dec 14, 2015 at 14:37 | comment | added | David says Reinstate Monica | In my company about 40% of the people are Vice Presidents, and we don't have the director title. It really depends on a per company basis. | |
Dec 14, 2015 at 13:20 | answer | added | Joe Strazzere | timeline score: 9 | |
Dec 14, 2015 at 11:52 | comment | added | Qwerky | In the UK a company "director" has specific meaning and carries specific responsibilities - see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directors%27_duties_in_the_United_Kingdom | |
Dec 14, 2015 at 9:46 | comment | added | Gusdor | @JosephRogers Silicon Valley is a bit of a joke in my UK office. Every graduate and their dog appears to bea VP or C_O or their 3 man basement hack-fest. | |
S Dec 14, 2015 at 9:32 | history | suggested | Magisch | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
+spelling, +slight rewording of problem statement, +misc grammar, +Reworded title for better readability.
|
Dec 14, 2015 at 8:06 | comment | added | Joseph Rogers | There is an impression (I imagine at least mostly incorrect! Certainly largely voiced in jest) in the UK that everyone in the US is VP of something | |
Dec 14, 2015 at 7:50 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Dec 14, 2015 at 9:32 | |||||
Dec 14, 2015 at 6:42 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackWorkplace/status/676291160751661056 | ||
Dec 14, 2015 at 3:58 | answer | added | Dawny33 | timeline score: 33 | |
Dec 14, 2015 at 3:40 | history | asked | Stephen Collings | CC BY-SA 3.0 |