Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 15, 2016 at 19:56 comment added paparazzo @CarlWitthoft But they did not file a patent to make Thingamabobs.
Nov 15, 2016 at 19:28 comment added GuitarPicker It sounds to me like a large portion of the OP's efforts were on the clock, though: "...using the time I saved from not having to do my job..."
Nov 15, 2016 at 19:18 comment added Carl Witthoft @Paparazzi That's not what I said. Suppose the company makes only Widgets, but as a result of this fellow's off-the-clock-efforts, they file a patent to make Thingamabobs as well, even though there's no connection between the two products.
Nov 15, 2016 at 15:00 comment added cdkMoose I can't think of any scenario where work you did tied specifically to your job and performed on company time would not be the property of the employer.
Nov 15, 2016 at 14:56 comment added paparazzo Before? If it applies to his job then it is in scope even if the company was not aware it could be automated.
Nov 15, 2016 at 14:44 comment added Carl Witthoft @Paparazzi That particular effort might be -- just because they patented it and used it to streamline some internal procedure doesn't mean it was in the company's scope before it was revealed to them. Like I said, he needs a local IP lawyer.
Nov 15, 2016 at 14:25 comment added paparazzo But the software is clearly is in the scope of the company's interests.
Nov 15, 2016 at 12:41 review First posts
Nov 15, 2016 at 14:28
Nov 15, 2016 at 12:38 history answered Carl Witthoft CC BY-SA 3.0