Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 4, 2019 at 17:45 comment added Make42 @usr-local-ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ: I am no lawyer, that is why I wrote "might" ;-). It is just something I wrote to consider - one should ask a lawyer in the respective country. I read at the German lawyer website that it is illegal in Germany: advocard.de/streitlotse/internet-und-konsum/datenschutz/… However, writing down the conversation right after is both legal and evidence in court. When a student threatened my mother, a teacher, she wrote it down and had the document signed by the schools principal, proving it was written right after the conversation.
Feb 26, 2019 at 18:05 comment added user1026 @Make42 it's not illegal, but is has zero validity in a court trial, unless explicitly noticing them... another option (not suggested so far) might be, to openly ask all coworkers, if they have signed their resignation letters yet. this "might" create team dynamics ...in case they all have signed it.
Feb 25, 2019 at 17:24 comment added usr-local-ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ I mean I know the max speed limit in Switzerland on motorways is 120kmh but I am unable to cite the article/number/paragraph of rule that states it is 120kmh. And I know that above 160kmh you get a criminal sanction that is proportional to your annual earnings. But yet I don't know the exact inners of such rule. I am no Swiss lawyer. In my case, I know for sure blank-date resignation is illegal but I can't cite the rule. A professional lawyer is welcome to amend my answer. Different thing for eavesdropping: I dont' stand a final point on its legitimity.
Feb 25, 2019 at 13:19 comment added Old_Lamplighter @usr-local-ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ yes, but if someone is clearly speeding, once can site the speed limit. You're saying that something is clearly illegal when you don't know if it is or not.
Feb 25, 2019 at 12:29 comment added usr-local-ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ @RichardU not being a lawyer doesn't mean you don't know any rule. You may know some codes, know the principles (e.g. you know the maximum speed limits on your roads but cannot cite traffic rule number), but that disclaimer is meant to state that a "professional lawyer may provide a more complete answer". Try to interpret like that, tell me if it makes more sense.
Feb 25, 2019 at 12:24 history edited usr-local-ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 17 characters in body
Feb 25, 2019 at 8:49 comment added usr-local-ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ @Make42 might be. You are correct: it might be. But when it comes to criminal evidence, it might be not. I am no lawer, I don't know if you are, but it is better to consider such poossibility
Feb 25, 2019 at 8:48 history edited usr-local-ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ CC BY-SA 4.0
added 810 characters in body
Feb 24, 2019 at 14:52 comment added Make42 Using your phone to "secretely eavesdrop the conversation with your phone" might be illegal itself in your country.
Feb 23, 2019 at 19:51 comment added user207421 'Not uncommon': please provide evidence for your claim. I have never encountered this in 54 years in the workforce.
Feb 22, 2019 at 18:38 comment added Old_Lamplighter You may want to site the laws you are referring to, since you are not a lawyer. Also, in the beginning of your post, you frequently state that this is blatantly illegal, and then under your disclaimer, say that you are not. You should consider editing this for clarity
Feb 22, 2019 at 8:34 history answered usr-local-ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ CC BY-SA 4.0