Return to Question

Recently, I was in a technical interview with a QA lead with several years of working experience in this field. During the interview, the interviewer asked questions, which made me doubtful about his automation skills. I do understand that leaders do not need to have all the technical skills, but he is a technical QA lead.

During the interview, the team lead asked meaningless questions on CSS-Selector, Lombok, and Eclipse (STS) which made doubt on his programming (automation) skills.

I want to work in a team which the QA lead is a lot more knowledgeable than me. It gives me the opportunity to learn from him.

In which extent do you agree with the following statement?

During the interview, the interviewers evaluate applicant based on his answers, and the applicant can evaluate the interviewers based on their questions.

Obviously, I understand that the applicant also has the opportunity to ask questions typically at the end of the interview, but I believe I can gather an interviewer's technical expertise from their questions. The applicant definitely cannot ask the same kind of technical questions to their interviewers. Thus I believe the only way to evaluate the technical knowledge of the team lead is based on their questions.

Recently, I was in a technical interview with a QA lead with several years of working experience in this field. During the interview, the interviewer asked questions, which made me doubtful about his automation skills. I do understand that leaders do not need to have all the technical skills, but he is a technical QA lead.

During the interview, the team lead asked meaningless questions on CSS-Selector, Lombok, and Eclipse (STS) which made doubt on his programming (automation) skills.

I want to work in a team which the QA lead is a lot more knowledgeable than me. It gives me the opportunity to learn from him.

To what extent do you agree with the following statement?

During the interview, the interviewers evaluate applicant based on his answers, and the applicant can evaluate the interviewers based on their questions.

Obviously, I understand that the applicant also has the opportunity to ask questions typically at the end of the interview, but I believe I can gather an interviewer's technical expertise from their questions. The applicant definitely cannot ask the same kind of technical questions to their interviewers. Thus I believe the only way to evaluate the technical knowledge of the team lead is based on their questions.

Recently, I was in a technical interview with a QA lead with several years working experience in this field. During the interview, the interviewer asked questions, which made me doubtful about his automation skills. I do understand that, leaders do not need to have all the technical skills, but he is a technical QA lead.

During the interview, the team lead asked meaningless questions on CSS-Selector, Lombok, and Eclipse (STS) which made doubt on his programming (automation) skills.

I want to work in a team which the QA lead is a lot more knowledgeable than me. It gives me the opportunity to learn from him.

In which extend do you agree with the following statement?

During the interview, the interviewers evaluate applicant based on his answers, and the applicant can evaluate the interviewers based on their questions.

Obviously I understand that the applicant also has the opportunity to ask questions typically at the end of the interview, but I believe I can gather an interviewer's technical expertise from their questions. The applicant definitely cannot ask the same kind of technical questions to their interviewers. Thus I believe the only way to evaluate the technical knowledge of the the team lead is based on their questions.

Recently, I was in a technical interview with a QA lead with several years of working experience in this field. During the interview, the interviewer asked questions, which made me doubtful about his automation skills. I do understand that leaders do not need to have all the technical skills, but he is a technical QA lead.

During the interview, the team lead asked meaningless questions on CSS-Selector, Lombok, and Eclipse (STS) which made doubt on his programming (automation) skills.

I want to work in a team which the QA lead is a lot more knowledgeable than me. It gives me the opportunity to learn from him.

In which extent do you agree with the following statement?

During the interview, the interviewers evaluate applicant based on his answers, and the applicant can evaluate the interviewers based on their questions.

Obviously, I understand that the applicant also has the opportunity to ask questions typically at the end of the interview, but I believe I can gather an interviewer's technical expertise from their questions. The applicant definitely cannot ask the same kind of technical questions to their interviewers. Thus I believe the only way to evaluate the technical knowledge of the team lead is based on their questions.

Recently, i was in a technical interview with a QA lead with several years working experience in this field. During the interview, the interviewer asked questions, which made me doubtful about his automation skills. I do understand that, leaders do not need to have all the technical skills, but he is suppose to be a technical QA lead.

I wish to work in a team which the QA lead is by far knowledgeable than me. It gives me the opportunity to learn from him.

But, during the interview, the team lead asked meaningless, questions regarding CSS-Selector, Lombok, and Eclipse (STS) and he made me cast doubt on his programming (automation) skills.

In which extend do you agree with the following statement?

During the interview, the interviewers evaluate applicant based on his answers, and the applicant can evaluate the interviewers based on their questions.

Of course, i know, the applicant also has the opportunity to ask questions, but i believe evaluation based on questions is deeper.For sure, the applicant cannot ask technical questions from interviewers, so i believe, the only way to evaluate the technical knowledge of the the team lead is his questions.

Recently, I was in a technical interview with a QA lead with several years working experience in this field. During the interview, the interviewer asked questions, which made me doubtful about his automation skills. I do understand that, leaders do not need to have all the technical skills, but he is a technical QA lead.

During the interview, the team lead asked meaningless questions on CSS-Selector, Lombok, and Eclipse (STS) which made doubt on his programming (automation) skills.

I want to work in a team which the QA lead is a lot more knowledgeable than me. It gives me the opportunity to learn from him.

In which extend do you agree with the following statement?

During the interview, the interviewers evaluate applicant based on his answers, and the applicant can evaluate the interviewers based on their questions.

Obviously I understand that the applicant also has the opportunity to ask questions typically at the end of the interview, but I believe I can gather an interviewer's technical expertise from their questions. The applicant definitely cannot ask the same kind of technical questions to their interviewers. Thus I believe the only way to evaluate the technical knowledge of the the team lead is based on their questions.