Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 27, 2023 at 0:22 vote accept 8protons
Jan 21, 2023 at 9:22 comment added Stian @gnasher729 agreed. That is mildly abrasive at worst. Besides, 'toxic' has no qualitative description power, it is a nebulous slander that is best avoided, IMHO. Describe the behavior concretely.
Jan 18, 2023 at 15:18 answer added DJClayworth timeline score: 1
Jan 16, 2023 at 23:10 answer added Steve timeline score: -5
Jan 16, 2023 at 18:33 comment added gnasher729 I'd say you haven't met a toxic manager yet.
Jan 16, 2023 at 10:06 comment added jwsc IMHO a lot of the above behaviour, especially the first four points are personal quirks. It's not nice to work with someone who acts that way, but it's a known behaviour you can get accustomed to. This manager has a rather pessimistic personality. Most probably you never get praise from him, so don't expect it. This behaviour may pull down morale, but I wouldn't classify it as damaging the business. So if you skip levels, use some very specific cases where his communication style really caused a loss to the business, not just a "downer" to you.
Jan 16, 2023 at 6:24 history edited 8protons CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 110 characters in body
Jan 16, 2023 at 4:48 review Close votes
Jan 22, 2023 at 3:03
Jan 16, 2023 at 1:17 answer added Gregory Currie timeline score: 3
Jan 16, 2023 at 0:51 answer added Joe Strazzere timeline score: 8
Jan 16, 2023 at 0:50 history edited 8protons CC BY-SA 4.0
added 225 characters in body
Jan 16, 2023 at 0:36 history asked 8protons CC BY-SA 4.0