Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

I follow the robustness principle for emails: "Be conservative in what you send, be liberal in what you accept" :-)

Here's how what I've learned from Postel's Law applies in this scenario:

  • You cannot control what others send to you; thus, for maximum benefit you should accept everything.
  • You cannot control what others accept from you; thus, for maximum benefit you should send it in a way that everyone accepts.

Sure, you can be angry about formless emails and attempt to teach people, but this doesn't accomplish anything.

So I always use a short envelope but don't mind if others don't. In fact, I appreciate it as it saves time.

By the way, I use the Quicktext add-on for Thunderbird for handling the formalities for me. Hitting Alt+1 creates:

Hi [First Name],

 

[Cursor]

 

Regards, Me

Alt+2 then is the more formal version and so on. So you can write quickly and still be a bit nice :-)

I follow the robustness principle for emails: "Be conservative in what you send, be liberal in what you accept" :-)

Here's how what I've learned from Postel's Law applies in this scenario:

  • You cannot control what others send to you; thus, for maximum benefit you should accept everything.
  • You cannot control what others accept from you; thus, for maximum benefit you should send it in a way that everyone accepts.

Sure, you can be angry about formless emails and attempt to teach people, but this doesn't accomplish anything.

So I always use a short envelope but don't mind if others don't. In fact, I appreciate it as it saves time.

By the way, I use the Quicktext add-on for Thunderbird for handling the formalities for me. Hitting Alt+1 creates:

Hi [First Name],

 

[Cursor]

 

Regards, Me

Alt+2 then is the more formal version and so on. So you can write quickly and still be a bit nice :-)

I follow the robustness principle for emails: "Be conservative in what you send, be liberal in what you accept" :-)

Here's how what I've learned from Postel's Law applies in this scenario:

  • You cannot control what others send to you; thus, for maximum benefit you should accept everything.
  • You cannot control what others accept from you; thus, for maximum benefit you should send it in a way that everyone accepts.

Sure, you can be angry about formless emails and attempt to teach people, but this doesn't accomplish anything.

So I always use a short envelope but don't mind if others don't. In fact, I appreciate it as it saves time.

By the way, I use the Quicktext add-on for Thunderbird for handling the formalities for me. Hitting Alt+1 creates:

Hi [First Name],

[Cursor]

Regards, Me

Alt+2 then is the more formal version and so on. So you can write quickly and still be a bit nice :-)

Notice removed Needs detailed answers by jmort253
removed meta commentary; copy edited some grammar, and formatted the quicktext output in a quote block.
Source Link
jmort253
  • 11.4k
  • 5
  • 59
  • 83

I follow the robustness principle for emails: "Be conservative in what you send, be liberal in what you accept" :-)

Edit: I was asked to explain whyHere's how what I've learned from Postel's Law applies in this is good. Even though I think it's obviousscenario:

  • youYou cannot control what others send to you,you; thus, for maximum benefit you should accept everything.
  • youYou cannot control what others accept from you,you; thus, for maximum benefit you should send it in a way that everyone accepts.

Sure, you can be angry about formless emails and attempt to teach people, but this doesn't accomplish anything.

So I always use a short envelope but don't mind if others don't, in. In fact, I appreciate it as it saves time.

By the way, I use the Quicktext addonadd-on for Thunderbird for handling the formalities for me. Hitting Alt+1 creates:

Hi [First Name],

Hi [First Name],

[Cursor]

[Cursor]

Regards, Me

Regards, Me

Alt+2 then is the more formal version and so on. So you can write quickly and still be a bit nice :-)

I follow the robustness principle for emails: "Be conservative in what you send, be liberal in what you accept" :-)

Edit: I was asked to explain why this is good. Even though I think it's obvious:

  • you cannot control what others send to you, thus for maximum benefit you should accept everything
  • you cannot control what others accept from you, thus for maximum benefit you should send it in a way that everyone accepts

Sure, you can be angry about formless emails and attempt to teach people, but this doesn't accomplish anything.

So I always use a short envelope but don't mind if others don't, in fact I appreciate it as it saves time.

By the way I use the Quicktext addon for Thunderbird for handling the formalities for me. Hitting Alt+1 creates:

Hi [First Name],

[Cursor]

Regards, Me

Alt+2 then is the more formal version and so on. So you can write quickly and still be a bit nice :-)

I follow the robustness principle for emails: "Be conservative in what you send, be liberal in what you accept" :-)

Here's how what I've learned from Postel's Law applies in this scenario:

  • You cannot control what others send to you; thus, for maximum benefit you should accept everything.
  • You cannot control what others accept from you; thus, for maximum benefit you should send it in a way that everyone accepts.

Sure, you can be angry about formless emails and attempt to teach people, but this doesn't accomplish anything.

So I always use a short envelope but don't mind if others don't. In fact, I appreciate it as it saves time.

By the way, I use the Quicktext add-on for Thunderbird for handling the formalities for me. Hitting Alt+1 creates:

Hi [First Name],

[Cursor]

Regards, Me

Alt+2 then is the more formal version and so on. So you can write quickly and still be a bit nice :-)

added 434 characters in body
Source Link

I follow the robustness principle for emails: "Be conservative in what you send, be liberal in what you accept" :-)

Edit: I was asked to explain why this is good. Even though I think it's obvious:

  • you cannot control what others send to you, thus for maximum benefit you should accept everything
  • you cannot control what others accept from you, thus for maximum benefit you should send it in a way that everyone accepts

Sure, you can be angry about formless emails and attempt to teach people, but this doesn't accomplish anything.

So I always use a short envelope but don't mind if others don't, in fact I appreciate it as it saves time.

By the way I use the Quicktext addon for Thunderbird for handling the formalities for me. Hitting Alt+1 creates:

Hi [First Name],

[Cursor]

Regards, Me

Alt+2 then is the more formal version and so on. So you can write quickly and still be a bit nice :-)

I follow the robustness principle for emails: "Be conservative in what you send, be liberal in what you accept" :-)

So I always use a short envelope but don't mind if others don't, in fact I appreciate it as it saves time.

By the way I use the Quicktext addon for Thunderbird for handling the formalities for me. Hitting Alt+1 creates:

Hi [First Name],

[Cursor]

Regards, Me

Alt+2 then is the more formal version and so on. So you can write quickly and still be a bit nice :-)

I follow the robustness principle for emails: "Be conservative in what you send, be liberal in what you accept" :-)

Edit: I was asked to explain why this is good. Even though I think it's obvious:

  • you cannot control what others send to you, thus for maximum benefit you should accept everything
  • you cannot control what others accept from you, thus for maximum benefit you should send it in a way that everyone accepts

Sure, you can be angry about formless emails and attempt to teach people, but this doesn't accomplish anything.

So I always use a short envelope but don't mind if others don't, in fact I appreciate it as it saves time.

By the way I use the Quicktext addon for Thunderbird for handling the formalities for me. Hitting Alt+1 creates:

Hi [First Name],

[Cursor]

Regards, Me

Alt+2 then is the more formal version and so on. So you can write quickly and still be a bit nice :-)

Notice added Needs detailed answers by jmort253
Source Link
Loading